clause.Set([]clause.Assignment{{clause.PrimaryColumn, 1}}),
			},
			"UPDATE `users` SET `users`.`id`=?",
			[]interface{}{1},
		},
		{
			[]clause.Interface{
				clause.Update{},
				clause.Set([]clause.Assignment{{clause.PrimaryColumn, 1}}),
				clause.Set([]clause.Assignment{{clause.Column{Name: "name"}, "jinzhu"}}),
			},
			"UPDATE `users` SET `name`=?",
			[]interface{}{"jinzhu"},
		},
	}

package utils

import (
	"testing"
)

func TestSourceDir(t *testing.T) {
	cases := []struct {
		file string
		want string
	}{
		{
			file: `C:/Users/name/go/pkg/mod/gorm.io/gorm@v1.2.3/utils/utils.go`,
			want: `C:/Users/name/go/pkg/mod/gorm.io/`,
		},
		{
			file: `C:/go/work/proj/gorm/utils/utils.go`,
			want: `C:/go/work/proj/gorm/`,
		},
		{
			file: `C:/go/work/proj/gorm_alias/utils/utils.go`,

	}{
		{
			[]clause.Interface{clause.Select{}, clause.From{}, clause.GroupBy{
				Columns: []clause.Column{{Name: "role"}},
				Having:  []clause.Expression{clause.Eq{"role", "admin"}},
			}},
			"SELECT * FROM `users` GROUP BY `role` HAVING `role` = ?",
			[]interface{}{"admin"},
		},
		{
			[]clause.Interface{clause.Select{}, clause.From{}, clause.GroupBy{
				Columns: []clause.Column{{Name: "role"}},

		echo "Failed to verify groups: $groups"
		exit 1
	fi

	users=$(echo "$output" | jq -r '.result.policyMappings[] | select(.policy == "readwrite") | .users[]')
	if [ "$users" != "uid=dillon,ou=people,ou=swengg,dc=min,dc=io" ]; then
		echo "Failed to verify users: $users"
		exit 1
	fi

	mc admin service stop new-minio
}

main() {
	create_iam_content_in_old_minio

		Vars:   []interface{}{clause.Table{Name: "users"}, clause.Column{Name: "id"}, clause.Expr{SQL: "int"}, clause.Column{Name: "name"}, clause.Expr{SQL: "text"}},
		Result: "create table `users` (`id` int, `name` text)",
	}}

	for idx, result := range results {
		t.Run(fmt.Sprintf("case #%v", idx), func(t *testing.T) {
			user, _ := schema.Parse(&tests.User{}, &sync.Map{}, db.NamingStrategy)

## ✔ 🤔

🕐❔ 🏗 *➡ 🛠️*, 👆 💪 🔎 ⚠ 🌐❔ 👆 ✔️ 🔧 ➡.

💖 `/users/me`, ➡️ 💬 👈 ⚫️ 🤚 📊 🔃 ⏮️ 👩‍💻.

& ⤴️ 👆 💪 ✔️ ➡ `/users/{user_id}` 🤚 💽 🔃 🎯 👩‍💻 👩‍💻 🆔.

↩️ *➡ 🛠️* 🔬 ✔, 👆 💪 ⚒ 💭 👈 ➡ `/users/me` 📣 ⏭ 1️⃣ `/users/{user_id}`:

{* ../../docs_src/path_params/tutorial003.py hl[6,11] *}

⏪, ➡ `/users/{user_id}` 🔜 🏏 `/users/me`, "💭" 👈 ⚫️ 📨 🔢 `user_id` ⏮️ 💲 `"me"`.

➡, 👆 🚫🔜 ↔ ➡ 🛠️:

Like `/users/me`, let's say that it's to get data about the current user.

And then you can also have a path `/users/{user_id}` to get data about a specific user by some user ID.

Because *path operations* are evaluated in order, you need to make sure that the path for `/users/me` is declared before the one for `/users/{user_id}`:

{* ../../docs_src/path_params/tutorial003.py hl[6,11] *}

Como `/users/me`, imaginemos que es para obtener datos sobre el usuario actual.

Y luego también puedes tener un path `/users/{user_id}` para obtener datos sobre un usuario específico por algún ID de usuario.

Debido a que las *path operations* se evalúan en orden, necesitas asegurarte de que el path para `/users/me` se declara antes que el de `/users/{user_id}`:

Например, `/users/me`. Предположим, что это путь для получения данных о текущем пользователе.

У вас также может быть путь `/users/{user_id}`, чтобы получить данные о конкретном пользователе по его ID.

Поскольку *операции пути* выполняются в порядке их объявления, необходимо, чтобы путь для `/users/me` был объявлен раньше, чем путь для `/users/{user_id}`:

   * non-nullable {@code cause}, as many users expect to find one.
   */
  public UncheckedExecutionException(@Nullable String message, @Nullable Throwable cause) {
    super(message, cause);
  }

  /**
   * Creates a new instance with {@code null} as its detail message and the given cause. Prefer to
   * provide a non-nullable {@code cause}, as many users expect to find one.
   */