name: build

on:
  push:
    branches:
      - master
  pull_request:
    types: [opened, labeled, unlabeled, synchronize]

permissions:
  contents: read

env:
  GRADLE_OPTS: "-Xmx4g -Dorg.gradle.daemon=false -Dkotlin.incremental=false"

concurrency:
  group: ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.ref }}
  cancel-in-progress: true

jobs:
  publish:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest

        message += f" for {language}"
    if command:
        message += f" ({command})"
    subprocess.run(["git", "commit", "-m", message], check=True)
    print("Pushing branch")
    subprocess.run(["git", "push", "origin", branch_name], check=True)
    if not commit_in_place:
        print("Creating PR")
        g = Github(github_token)
        gh_repo = g.get_repo(github_repository)
        body = (
            message

  public val shutdownServer: Boolean

  public val headersDelayNanos: Long
  public val bodyDelayNanos: Long
  public val trailersDelayNanos: Long

  /** The streams the server will push with this response. */
  public val pushPromises: List<PushPromise>

  public val settings: Settings

  public constructor(
    code: Int = 200,
    headers: Headers = headersOf(),
    body: String = "",

 *
 * <h3>Providing input to a hash function</h3>
 *
 * <p>The primary way to provide the data that your hash function should act on is via a {@link
 * Hasher}. Obtain a new hasher from the hash function using {@link #newHasher}, "push" the relevant
 * data into it using methods like {@link Hasher#putBytes(byte[])}, and finally ask for the {@code
 * HashCode} when finished using {@link Hasher#hash}. (See an {@linkplain #newHasher example} of
 * this.)
 *

selected=''></option></select>",e.querySelectorAll("[selected]").length||d.push("\\["+ge+"*(?:value|"+f+")"),e.querySelectorAll("[id~="+S+"-]").length||d.push("~="),e.querySelectorAll("a#"+S+"+*").length||d.push(".#.+[+~]"),e.querySelectorAll(":checked").length||d.push(":checked"),(t=T.createElement("input")).setAttribute("type","hidden"),e.appendChild(t).setAttribute("name","D"),r.appendChild(e).disabled=!0,2!==e.querySelectorAll(":disabled").length&&d.push(":enabled",":disabled"),(t=T.createElement("input")).set...

      // but work beyond that must take at least one second
      assertThat(afterBurst).isAtLeast(1000);
    }
  }

  /**
   * This neat test shows that no matter what weights we use in our requests, if we push X amount of
   * permits in a cool state, where X = rate * timeToCoolDown, and we have specified a
   * timeToWarmUp() period, it will cost as the prescribed amount of time. E.g., calling

      // but work beyond that must take at least one second
      assertThat(afterBurst).isAtLeast(1000);
    }
  }

  /**
   * This neat test shows that no matter what weights we use in our requests, if we push X amount of
   * permits in a cool state, where X = rate * timeToCoolDown, and we have specified a
   * timeToWarmUp() period, it will cost as the prescribed amount of time. E.g., calling

varying amounts of time depending on who is available, where the change is, and
how deep the change is. There is no way to predict how long it will take unless
we rush.
* We do not rush reviews without a very, very good reason. Class deadlines
aren't a good enough reason for us to rush reviews.
* We deeply discourage opening a PR you don't intend to work through the entire
code review process because it wastes our time.

selected=''></option></select>",e.querySelectorAll("[selected]").length||d.push("\\["+ge+"*(?:value|"+f+")"),e.querySelectorAll("[id~="+S+"-]").length||d.push("~="),e.querySelectorAll("a#"+S+"+*").length||d.push(".#.+[+~]"),e.querySelectorAll(":checked").length||d.push(":checked"),(t=T.createElement("input")).setAttribute("type","hidden"),e.appendChild(t).setAttribute("name","D"),r.appendChild(e).disabled=!0,2!==e.querySelectorAll(":disabled").length&&d.push(":enabled",":disabled"),(t=T.createElement("input")).set...

 *
 * @since 2.0
 */
@DoNotMock("Use ImmutableList.of or another implementation")
@GwtCompatible
@SuppressWarnings("serial") // we're overriding default serialization
// TODO(kevinb): I think we should push everything down to "BaseImmutableCollection" or something,
// just to do everything we can to emphasize the "practically an interface" nature of this class.