Eu estive evitando a criação de um novo _framework_ por vários anos. Primeiro tentei resolver todas as funcionalidades cobertas por **FastAPI** usando muitos _frameworks_, _plug-ins_ e ferramentas diferentes.

I have been avoiding the creation of a new framework for several years. First I tried to solve all the features covered by **FastAPI** using many different frameworks, plug-ins, and tools.

import com.google.common.base.Function;
import com.google.common.base.Predicate;
import com.google.common.base.Predicates;
import com.google.common.math.IntMath;
import com.google.common.primitives.Ints;
import java.util.AbstractCollection;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.Comparator;
import java.util.Iterator;

import static java.util.Arrays.stream;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertThrows;

import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList;
import com.google.common.math.StatsTesting.ManyValues;
import com.google.common.primitives.Ints;
import com.google.common.primitives.Longs;
import com.google.common.testing.EqualsTester;
import com.google.common.testing.SerializableTester;
import java.math.BigDecimal;
import java.nio.ByteBuffer;

 * <i>unsigned</i> (that is, any negative value {@code x} is treated as the positive value {@code
 * 2^32 + x}). The methods for which signedness is not an issue are in {@link Ints}, as well as
 * signed versions of methods for which signedness is an issue.
 *
 * <p>In addition, this class provides several static methods for converting an {@code int} to a

 * <i>unsigned</i> (that is, any negative value {@code x} is treated as the positive value {@code
 * 2^32 + x}). The methods for which signedness is not an issue are in {@link Ints}, as well as
 * signed versions of methods for which signedness is an issue.
 *
 * <p>In addition, this class provides several static methods for converting an {@code int} to a

import com.google.common.base.CharMatcher;
import com.google.common.base.MoreObjects;
import com.google.common.hash.Hashing;
import com.google.common.io.ByteStreams;
import com.google.common.primitives.Ints;
import com.google.errorprone.annotations.CanIgnoreReturnValue;
import java.math.BigInteger;
import java.net.Inet4Address;
import java.net.Inet6Address;
import java.net.InetAddress;
import java.net.NetworkInterface;

    } else {
      return next >>> 1;
    }
  }

  public void testCrc32cStrideTable() {
    int next = CRC32C_GENERATOR_FLIPPED;
    for (int i = 0; i < 12; i++) { // for 3 ints = 12 bytes in between each stride window
      next = (next >>> 8) ^ Crc32cHashFunction.Crc32cHasher.BYTE_TABLE[next & 0xFF];
    }
    int[][] expected = new int[4][256];
    for (int b = 0; b < 4; ++b) {

     * CRC(A000A000A000...), CRC(0B000B000B...), CRC(00C000C000C...), CRC(000D000D000D...)
     * and then to XOR them together.  The STRIDE_TABLE enables us to hash an int followed by 12
     * zero bytes (3 ints), while the BYTE_TABLE is for advancing one byte at a time.
     * This algorithm is due to the paper "Everything we know about CRC but [are] afraid to forget"
     * by Kadatch and Jenkins, 2010.
     */

    Crc32cHasher() {

            tail[padLen + i] = (byte)((count * 8) >>> (8 * i));

        engineUpdate(tail, 0, tail.length);

        byte[] result = new byte[16];
        // cast this MD4's context (array of 4 ints) into an array of 16 bytes.
        for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++)
            for (int j = 0; j < 4; j++)
                result[i * 4 + j] = (byte)(context[i] >>> (8 * j));

        // reset the engine