assertThat(reader.nextPart()).isNull()
  }

  /**
   * Read 100 MiB of 'a' chars. This was really slow due to a performance bug in [MultipartReader],
   * and will be really slow if we regress the fix for that.
   */
  @Test
  fun `reading a large part with small byteCount`() {
    val multipartBody =
      MultipartBody
        .Builder("foo")
        .addPart(

                    failureUrl.setId("E" + i);
                    failureUrl.setUrl("http://test.com/" + i + ".html");
                    failureUrl.setErrorCount(i + 1);
                    // Mix different error names
                    if (i == 0) {
                        failureUrl.setErrorName("java.net.ConnectException");
                    } else if (i == 1) {

    /*
     * If greatestOf() promised to be implemented as reverse().leastOf(), this
     * test would be enough. It doesn't... but we'll cheat and act like it does
     * anyway. There's a comment there to remind us to fix this if we change it.
     */
    List<Integer> list = asList(3, 1, 3, 2, 4, 2, 4, 3);
    assertEquals(asList(4, 4, 3, 3), numberOrdering.greatestOf(list, 4));
  }

  public void testGreatestOfIterator_simple() {

    /*
     * If greatestOf() promised to be implemented as reverse().leastOf(), this
     * test would be enough. It doesn't... but we'll cheat and act like it does
     * anyway. There's a comment there to remind us to fix this if we change it.
     */
    List<Integer> list = asList(3, 1, 3, 2, 4, 2, 4, 3);
    assertEquals(asList(4, 4, 3, 3), numberOrdering.greatestOf(list, 4));
  }

  public void testGreatestOfIterator_simple() {

              <logLevel>${gwt.logLevel}</logLevel>
              <mode>htmlunit</mode>
              <htmlunit>FF38</htmlunit>
              <productionMode>true</productionMode>
              <!-- Fix OutOfMemoryError under Travis. -->
              <extraJvmArgs>-Xms3500m -Xmx3500m -Xss1024k</extraJvmArgs>
              <sourceLevel>1.8</sourceLevel>

  @Override
  /*
   * This suppression is here for two reasons:
   *
   * 1. b/192354773 in our checker affects toArray declarations.
   *
   * 2. `other[size] = null` is unsound. We could "fix" this by requiring callers to pass in an
   * array with a nullable element type. But probably they usually want an array with a non-nullable
   * type. That said, we could *accept* a `@Nullable T[]` (which, given that we treat arrays as

  @Override
  /*
   * This suppression is here for two reasons:
   *
   * 1. b/192354773 in our checker affects toArray declarations.
   *
   * 2. `other[size] = null` is unsound. We could "fix" this by requiring callers to pass in an
   * array with a nullable element type. But probably they usually want an array with a non-nullable
   * type. That said, we could *accept* a `@Nullable T[]` (which, given that we treat arrays as

 * {@code String} and a {@code String} to an {@code int} that treat the {@code int} as an unsigned
 * number.
 *
 * <p>Users of these utilities must be <i>extremely careful</i> not to mix up signed and unsigned
 * {@code int} values. When possible, it is recommended that the {@link UnsignedInteger} wrapper
 * class be used, at a small efficiency penalty, to enforce the distinction in the type system.
 *

  //   and we could use that to make a decision about whether or not we timed out prior to being
  //   unparked.

  @SuppressWarnings({
    "LabelledBreakTarget", // TODO(b/345814817): Maybe fix?
    "nullness", // TODO(b/147136275): Remove once our checker understands & and |.
  })
  @ParametricNullness
  final V blockingGet(long timeout, TimeUnit unit)

     *
     * In that explanation's notation, our `overlap` check would be `x1 < y2 && y1 < x2`. We've
     * flipped one part of the check so that we're using "less than" in both cases (rather than a
     * mix of "less than" and "greater than"). We've also switched to "strictly less than" rather
     * than "less than or equal to" because of *handwave* the difference between "endpoints of
     * inclusive ranges" and "Cuts."
     */