reverse(array, fromIndex, toIndex);
  }

  /**
   * Reverses the elements of {@code array}. This is equivalent to {@code
   * Collections.reverse(Longs.asList(array))}, but is likely to be more efficient.
   *
   * @since 23.1
   */
  public static void reverse(long[] array) {
    checkNotNull(array);
    reverse(array, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

      }
    }
  }

  /** Returns the {@code Class} object of arrays with {@code componentType}. */
  static Class<?> getArrayClass(Class<?> componentType) {
    // TODO(user): This is not the most efficient way to handle generic
    // arrays, but is there another way to extract the array class in a
    // non-hacky way (i.e. using String value class names- "[L...")?
    return Array.newInstance(componentType, 0).getClass();

// call Recycle() when the object is no longer needed.
// The recycler should handle nil pointers.
type Recycler interface {
	Recycle()
}

// MSS is a map[string]string that can be serialized.
// It is not very efficient, but it is only used for easy parameter passing.
type MSS map[string]string

// Get returns the value for the given key.
func (m *MSS) Get(key string) string {
	if m == nil {
		return ""
	}
	return (*m)[key]

    return file(new File(first), more);
  }

  /** Returns a {@code File} object for the given path parts. */
  private static File file(File first, String... more) {
    // not very efficient, but should definitely be correct
    File file = first;
    for (String name : more) {
      file = new File(file, name);
    }
    return file;
  }

  /**
   * Creates a new {@code ConcurrentHashMultiset} containing the specified elements, using the
   * default initial capacity, load factor, and concurrency settings.
   *
   * <p>This implementation is highly efficient when {@code elements} is itself a {@link Multiset}.
   *
   * @param elements the elements that the multiset should contain
   */
  public static <E> ConcurrentHashMultiset<E> create(Iterable<? extends E> elements) {

      }
    }
  }

  /** Returns the {@code Class} object of arrays with {@code componentType}. */
  static Class<?> getArrayClass(Class<?> componentType) {
    // TODO(user): This is not the most efficient way to handle generic
    // arrays, but is there another way to extract the array class in a
    // non-hacky way (i.e. using String value class names- "[L...")?
    return Array.newInstance(componentType, 0).getClass();

    return file(new File(first), more);
  }

  /** Returns a {@code File} object for the given path parts. */
  private static File file(File first, String... more) {
    // not very efficient, but should definitely be correct
    File file = first;
    for (String name : more) {
      file = new File(file, name);
    }
    return file;
  }

   * Reader#skip(long) skip} to the end of the stream, and return the total number of chars that
   * were skipped.
   *
   * <p>Note that for sources that implement {@link #lengthIfKnown} to provide a more efficient
   * implementation, it is <i>possible</i> that this method will return a different number of chars
   * than would be returned by reading all of the chars.
   *

   * Reader#skip(long) skip} to the end of the stream, and return the total number of chars that
   * were skipped.
   *
   * <p>Note that for sources that implement {@link #lengthIfKnown} to provide a more efficient
   * implementation, it is <i>possible</i> that this method will return a different number of chars
   * than would be returned by reading all of the chars.
   *

        }

        if (updateScope) {
            fireEvent(ResolutionListener.UPDATE_SCOPE, listeners, nearest, farthestArtifact);

            // previously we cloned the artifact, but it is more efficient to just update the artifactScope
            // if problems are later discovered that the original object needs its original artifactScope value,
            // cloning may
            // again be appropriate