* name, even if their bounds differ.
   *
   * <p>While resolving a type variable from a {@code var -> type} map, we don't care whether the
   * type variable's bound has been partially resolved. As long as the type variable "identity"
   * matches.
   *
   * <p>On the other hand, if for example we are resolving {@code List<A extends B>} to {@code
   * List<A extends String>}, we need to compare that {@code <A extends B>} is unequal to {@code <A

                .flatMap(p -> p.getProfiles().stream())
                .map(Profile::getId);

        return Stream.of(projectProfiles, settingsProfiles, superPomProfiles)
                .flatMap(Function.identity())
                .collect(toSet());
    }

    /**
     * Check whether the required profiles were found in any of the projects we're building or the settings.
     * @param session the Maven session.

Next, we create a `HeroPublic` model, this is the one that will be **returned** to the clients of the API.

It has the same fields as `HeroBase`, so it won't include `secret_name`.

Finally, the identity of our heroes is protected! 🥷

It also re-declares `id: int`. By doing this, we are making a **contract** with the API clients, so that they can always expect the `id` to be there and to be an `int` (it will never be `None`).

   *
   * <p>The intersection exists if and only if the two ranges are {@linkplain #isConnected
   * connected}.
   *
   * <p>The intersection operation is commutative, associative and idempotent, and its identity
   * element is {@link Range#all}).
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code isConnected(connectedRange)} is {@code false}
   */
  public Range<C> intersection(Range<C> connectedRange) {

   * ValueGraph#hasEdgeConnecting(EndpointPair)}.
   *
   * @since 27.1
   */
  @Override
  boolean hasEdgeConnecting(EndpointPair<N> endpoints);

  //
  // Network identity
  //

  /**
   * Returns {@code true} iff {@code object} is a {@link Network} that has the same elements and the
   * same structural relationships as those in this network.
   *

   *
   * @since 21.0
   */
  public static <E> Collector<E, ?, ImmutableSortedMultiset<E>> toImmutableSortedMultiset(
      Comparator<? super E> comparator) {
    return toImmutableSortedMultiset(comparator, Function.identity(), e -> 1);
  }

  /**
   * Returns a {@code Collector} that accumulates elements into an {@code ImmutableSortedMultiset}
   * whose elements are the result of applying {@code elementFunction} to the inputs, with counts

   * example, {@code [] < [1] < [1, 2] < [2]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(int[], int[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static Comparator<int[]> lexicographicalComparator() {
    return LexicographicalComparator.INSTANCE;

   * array as the lesser. For example, {@code [] < ['a'] < ['a', 'b'] < ['b']}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(char[],
   * char[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static Comparator<char[]> lexicographicalComparator() {

   * lesser. For example, {@code [] < [1.0f] < [1.0f, 2.0f] < [2.0f]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(float[],
   * float[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static Comparator<float[]> lexicographicalComparator() {

   * lesser. For example, {@code [] < [1.0] < [1.0, 2.0] < [2.0]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(double[],
   * double[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static Comparator<double[]> lexicographicalComparator() {