*/

package com.google.common.cache;

import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkArgument;
import static com.google.common.math.LongMath.saturatedAdd;
import static com.google.common.math.LongMath.saturatedSubtract;
import static java.lang.Math.max;

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
import com.google.common.base.MoreObjects;
import java.util.Objects;
import java.util.concurrent.Callable;

        case 0x00:
            return "This folder only";
        case 0x03:
            return "This folder, subfolders and files";
        case 0x0B:
            return "Subfolders and files only";
        case 0x02:
            return "This folder and subfolders";
        case 0x0A:
            return "Subfolders only";
        case 0x01:
            return "This folder and files";

    exit 1
fi

if [ -z "$FESS_CLASSPATH" ]; then
    echo "You must set the FESS_CLASSPATH var" >&2
    exit 1
fi

# Special-case path variables.
case `uname` in
    CYGWIN*)
        FESS_CLASSPATH=`cygpath -p -w "$FESS_CLASSPATH"`
        FESS_HOME=`cygpath -p -w "$FESS_HOME"`
        if [ "x$FESS_CONF_PATH" != "x" ] ; then

     */
    public synchronized void connect(final long timeout) throws TransportException {
        try {
            switch (state) {
            case 0:
                break;
            case 3:
                return; // already connected
            case 4:
                state = 0;
                throw new TransportException("Connection in error", te);
            default:

 * the License.
 */

package com.google.common.io;

import static com.google.common.base.StandardSystemProperty.JAVA_IO_TMPDIR;
import static com.google.common.base.StandardSystemProperty.USER_NAME;
import static com.google.common.base.Throwables.throwIfUnchecked;
import static java.nio.file.attribute.AclEntryFlag.DIRECTORY_INHERIT;

        that it's for a use case that actually comes up in the real world. We want to hear the
        real-world use case so the community can discuss and debate whether this feature is actually
        the *best* way to address the real use case, or whether or not a different approach might be
        more appropriate.


        It's okay if you can't provide complete context on a use case. We understand if you are not

						}
					}
				}

				switch db.Statement.ReflectValue.Kind() {
				case reflect.Slice, reflect.Array:
					for i := 0; i < db.Statement.ReflectValue.Len(); i++ {
						obj := db.Statement.ReflectValue.Index(i)
						if reflect.Indirect(obj).Kind() == reflect.Struct {
							appendToElems(obj)
						}
					}
				case reflect.Struct:
					appendToElems(db.Statement.ReflectValue)
				}

        switch (tc.getConfig().getLanManCompatibility()) {
        case 0:
        case 1:
        case 2:
            byte[] signingKey = new byte[40];
            getUserSessionKey(tc, chlng, signingKey, 0);
            System.arraycopy(getUnicodeHash(tc, chlng), 0, signingKey, 16, 24);
            return signingKey;
        case 3:
        case 4:
        case 5:
            /*

	)

	switch stmt.ReflectValue.Kind() {
	case reflect.Slice, reflect.Array:
		assignValue = func(field *schema.Field, value interface{}) {
			for i := 0; i < stmt.ReflectValue.Len(); i++ {
				if stmt.ReflectValue.CanAddr() {
					field.Set(stmt.Context, stmt.ReflectValue.Index(i), value)
				}
			}
		}
	case reflect.Struct:
		assignValue = func(field *schema.Field, value interface{}) {

		for i, column := range columns {
			v, ok := db.Statement.ColumnMapping[column]
			if ok {
				columns[i] = v
			}
		}
	}

	db.RowsAffected = 0

	switch dest := db.Statement.Dest.(type) {
	case map[string]interface{}, *map[string]interface{}:
		if initialized || rows.Next() {
			columnTypes, _ := rows.ColumnTypes()
			prepareValues(values, db, columnTypes, columns)

			db.RowsAffected++