- Sort Score
- Result 10 results
- Languages All
Results 91 - 100 of 153 for Benchmarks (0.28 sec)
-
docs/em/docs/async.md
& 👈 🎏 🎚 🎭 👆 🤚 ⏮️ **FastAPI**. & 👆 💪 ✔️ 🔁 & 🔀 🎏 🕰, 👆 🤚 ↕ 🎭 🌘 🌅 💯 ✳ 🛠️ & 🔛 🇷🇪 ⏮️ 🚶, ❔ ✍ 🇪🇸 🔐 🅱 <a href="https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r17&hw=ph&test=query&l=zijmkf-1" class="external-link" target="_blank">(🌐 👏 💃)</a>. ### 🛠️ 👍 🌘 🔁 ❓ 😆 ❗ 👈 🚫 🛐 📖.
Registered: Sun Sep 07 07:19:17 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Sun Aug 31 09:56:21 UTC 2025 - 18.6K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/es/docs/async.md
Y como puedes tener paralelismo y asincronía al mismo tiempo, obtienes un mayor rendimiento que la mayoría de los frameworks de NodeJS probados y a la par con Go, que es un lenguaje compilado más cercano a C <a href="https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r17&hw=ph&test=query&l=zijmkf-1" class="external-link" target="_blank">(todo gracias a Starlette)</a>. ### ¿Es la concurrencia mejor que el paralelismo? ¡No! Esa no es la moraleja de la historia.
Registered: Sun Sep 07 07:19:17 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Sun Aug 31 09:56:21 UTC 2025 - 24.7K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/fa/docs/async.md
و چون میتونی همزمانی و موازیسازی رو همزمان داشته باشی، عملکرد بالاتری از بیشتر فریمورکهای تستشده NodeJS میگیری و همتراز با Go، که یه زبون کامپایلشده نزدیک به C هست <a href="https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r17&hw=ph&test=query&l=zijmkf-1" class="external-link" target="_blank">(همه اینا به لطف Starlette)</a>. ### آیا همزمانی از موازیسازی بهتره؟ نه! این نتیجه داستان نیست.
Registered: Sun Sep 07 07:19:17 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Sun Aug 31 09:56:21 UTC 2025 - 32.9K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/em/docs/alternatives.md
👆 💪 🌀 ⚫️ ⏮️ 🐁, ✔️ 🔁 👁-🛠️ 💽. ✅ 🌅 ℹ [🛠️](deployment/index.md){.internal-link target=_blank} 📄. /// ## 📇 & 🚅
Registered: Sun Sep 07 07:19:17 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Sat Nov 09 16:39:20 UTC 2024 - 18.6K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/fr/docs/async.md
### Est-ce que la concurrence est mieux que le parallélisme ? Nope ! C'est ça la morale de l'histoire.
Registered: Sun Sep 07 07:19:17 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Sun Aug 31 09:56:21 UTC 2025 - 25.4K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/en/docs/release-notes.md
Registered: Sun Sep 07 07:19:17 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Fri Sep 05 12:48:45 UTC 2025 - 544.1K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/de/docs/async.md
### Ist Nebenläufigkeit besser als Parallelität? Nein! Das ist nicht die Moral der Geschichte.
Registered: Sun Sep 07 07:19:17 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Sun Aug 31 09:56:21 UTC 2025 - 26.5K bytes - Viewed (0) -
android/guava/src/com/google/common/util/concurrent/CycleDetectingLockFactory.java
* weak references. * * <p><strong>Performance</strong> * * <p>The extra bookkeeping done by cycle detecting locks comes at some cost to performance. * Benchmarks (as of December 2011) show that: * * <ul> * <li>for an unnested {@code lock()} and {@code unlock()}, a cycle detecting lock takes 38ns as * opposed to the 24ns taken by a plain lock.
Registered: Fri Sep 05 12:43:10 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Fri Jul 18 15:05:43 UTC 2025 - 35.9K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/zh-hant/docs/async.md
這種類型的非同步性正是 NodeJS 成功的原因(儘管 NodeJS 不是平行的),這也是 Go 語言作為程式語言的一個強大優勢。 這與 **FastAPI** 所能提供的性能水平相同。 你可以同時利用並行性和平行性,進一步提升效能,這比大多數已測試的 NodeJS 框架都更快,並且與 Go 語言相當,而 Go 是一種更接近 C 的編譯語言(<a href="https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r17&hw=ph&test=query&l=zijmkf-1" class="external-link" target="_blank">感謝 Starlette</a>)。 ### 並行比平行更好嗎? 不是的!這不是故事的本意。
Registered: Sun Sep 07 07:19:17 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Sun Aug 31 09:56:21 UTC 2025 - 21.1K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/en/docs/async.md
And as you can have parallelism and asynchronicity at the same time, you get higher performance than most of the tested NodeJS frameworks and on par with Go, which is a compiled language closer to C <a href="https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r17&hw=ph&test=query&l=zijmkf-1" class="external-link" target="_blank">(all thanks to Starlette)</a>. ### Is concurrency better than parallelism? { #is-concurrency-better-than-parallelism }
Registered: Sun Sep 07 07:19:17 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Sun Aug 31 09:56:21 UTC 2025 - 24K bytes - Viewed (0)