world, because the Go garbage collector is unaware of the memory
allocated by C.  The most important consideration is not to
constrain future implementations, so the rule is that Go code can
hand a Go pointer to C code but must separately arrange for
Go to hang on to a reference to the pointer until C is done with it.
*/
package gmp

/*
#cgo LDFLAGS: -lgmp
#include <gmp.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

   * (so much for "black box") and try instances that both do and don't pass the check. The "don't"
   * half of that is more awkward to arrange...
   */
  private static <T> Iterable<T> iterable(Collection<T> collection) {
    // return collection::iterator;
    return new Iterable<T>() {
      @Override
      public Iterator<T> iterator() {

   * (so much for "black box") and try instances that both do and don't pass the check. The "don't"
   * half of that is more awkward to arrange...
   */
  private static <T> Iterable<T> iterable(Collection<T> collection) {
    // return collection::iterator;
    return new Iterable<T>() {
      @Override
      public Iterator<T> iterator() {

      <resource>
        <directory>src</directory>
      </resource>
      <!-- src-super is copied to guava-gwt-sources (so that we can strip its @Nullable annotations), so we don't need to list it here. We may want to arrange something similar for test-super someday. -->
      <!-- TODO(cpovirk): Why do we have separate src and src-super directories, anyway? -->
      <resource>

publicly available network server or other readily accessible means,
then you must either (1) cause the Corresponding Source to be so
available, or (2) arrange to deprive yourself of the benefit of the
patent license for this particular work, or (3) arrange, in a manner
consistent with the requirements of this License, to extend the patent
license to downstream recipients.  "Knowingly relying" means you have

   * (so much for "black box") and try instances that both do and don't pass the check. The "don't"
   * half of that is more awkward to arrange...
   */
  private static <T> Iterable<T> iterable(Collection<T> collection) {
    // return collection::iterator;
    return new Iterable<T>() {
      @Override
      public Iterator<T> iterator() {

   * (so much for "black box") and try instances that both do and don't pass the check. The "don't"
   * half of that is more awkward to arrange...
   */
  private static <T> Iterable<T> iterable(Collection<T> collection) {
    // return collection::iterator;
    return new Iterable<T>() {
      @Override
      public Iterator<T> iterator() {

   * (so much for "black box") and try instances that both do and don't pass the check. The "don't"
   * half of that is more awkward to arrange...
   */
  private static <T> Iterable<T> iterable(Collection<T> collection) {
    // return collection::iterator;
    return new Iterable<T>() {
      @Override
      public Iterator<T> iterator() {

	// It is the caller's responsibility to arrange for it to be
	// freed, such as by calling C.free (be sure to include stdlib.h
	// if C.free is needed).
	func C.CString(string) *C.char

	// Go []byte slice to C array
	// The C array is allocated in the C heap using malloc.
	// It is the caller's responsibility to arrange for it to be
	// freed, such as by calling C.free (be sure to include stdlib.h

        if (cancelled) {
          // Unless it is cancelled, the delegate may continue being scheduled
          scheduledDelegate.cancel(mayInterruptIfRunning);

          /*
           * We'd love to also arrange for the inverse -- that is, to also automatically cancel this
           * future if scheduledDelegate is cancelled (as happens after the delegate executor is