* as sub-suites for testing the {@code CharSink} view in the same way.
 *
 * @author Colin Decker
 */
@AndroidIncompatible // TODO(b/230620681): Make this available (even though we won't run it).
@NullUnmarked
public class ByteSinkTester extends SourceSinkTester<ByteSink, byte[], ByteSinkFactory> {

  private static final ImmutableList<Method> testMethods = getTestMethods(ByteSinkTester.class);

    assertThat(dispatchedSubscribers)
        .containsExactly(
            i1,
            i2,
            i3, // Integer subscribers are dispatched to first.
            s1,
            s2, // Though each integer subscriber dispatches to all string subscribers,
            s1,
            s2, // those string subscribers aren't actually dispatched to until all integer
            s1,

{* ../../docs_src/dependencies/tutorial005_an_py310.py hl[13] *}

Let's focus on the parameters declared:

* Even though this function is a dependency ("dependable") itself, it also declares another dependency (it "depends" on something else).
    * It depends on the `query_extractor`, and assigns the value returned by it to the parameter `q`.

      assertEquals(200, response.code)
    }

    client.connectionPool.evictAll()
    assertEquals(0, client.connectionPool.connectionCount())

    // Force reuse. This appears flaky (30% of the time) even though sessions are reused.
    // javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: No new session is allowed and no existing
    // session can be resumed
    //
    // Report https://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=JDK-8264944

    }

    /**
     * Setup exactly the same as the above test, except that the child project
     * now depends upon d, which has a transitive dependency on c.  Even though
     * we did list an exclusion on c, it was only from within the context of
     * project b.  We will pick up project c in this case because no
     * restrictions were placed on d.  This demonstrates that a, b, c, & d will

  /** Returns true if this adapter can read [header] in a choice. */
  fun matches(header: DerHeader): Boolean

  /**
   * Returns a value from this adapter.
   *
   * This must always return a value, though it doesn't necessarily need to consume data from
   * [reader]. For example, if the reader's peeked tag isn't readable by this adapter, it may return
   * a default value.
   *

  @Override
  public Set<V> replaceValues(@ParametricNullness K key, Iterable<? extends V> values) {
    return (Set<V>) super.replaceValues(key, values);
  }

  /**
   * {@inheritDoc}
   *
   * <p>Though the method signature doesn't say so explicitly, the returned map has {@link Set}
   * values.
   */
  @Override
  public Map<K, Collection<V>> asMap() {
    return super.asMap();
  }

  /**

   * behavior as {@link #get}, returning a live collection. When passed a key that is not present,
   * however, {@code asMap().get(Object)} returns {@code null} instead of an empty collection.
   *
   * <p>Though the method signature doesn't say so explicitly, the returned map has {@link
   * SortedSet} values.
   */
  @Override
  public Map<K, Collection<V>> asMap() {
    return super.asMap();
  }

  /**

     *
     * Expected outputs are generated by the code itself, but they've been
     * checked against the inputs under Bash in order to confirm that the two
     * forms are equivalent (though not necessarily minimal, though we hope this
     * to be the case). Thus, this test is more of a regression test.
     *
     * Rough instructions to regenerate the test outputs and verify correctness:
     * - Temporarily change this test:

    Object writeReplace() {
    return super.writeReplace();
  }

  @GwtIncompatible
  @J2ktIncompatible
  /*
   * The mainline copy of ImmutableMapValues doesn't produce this serialized form anymore, though
   * the backport does. For now, we're keeping the class declaration in *both* flavors so that both
   * flavors can read old data or data from the other flavor. However, we strongly discourage