public void testVerifyNotNull_simple_success() {
    String result = verifyNotNull(NON_NULL_STRING);
    assertSame(NON_NULL_STRING, result);
  }

  public void testVerifyNotNull_simple_failure() {
    assertThrows(VerifyException.class, () -> verifyNotNull(null));
  }

  public void testVerifyNotNull_complexMessage_success() {
    String result = verifyNotNull(NON_NULL_STRING, "%s", IGNORE_ME);
    assertSame(NON_NULL_STRING, result);

  public void testVerifyNotNull_simple_success() {
    String result = verifyNotNull(NON_NULL_STRING);
    assertSame(NON_NULL_STRING, result);
  }

  public void testVerifyNotNull_simple_failure() {
    assertThrows(VerifyException.class, () -> verifyNotNull(null));
  }

  public void testVerifyNotNull_complexMessage_success() {
    String result = verifyNotNull(NON_NULL_STRING, "%s", IGNORE_ME);
    assertSame(NON_NULL_STRING, result);

    }
  }

  /*
   * For a discussion of the signature of verifyNotNull, see the discussion above
   * Preconditions.checkNotNull.
   *
   * (verifyNotNull has many fewer "problem" callers, so we could try to be stricter. On the other
   * hand, verifyNotNull arguably has more reason to accept nullable arguments in the first
   * place....)
   */

  /**

    }
  }

  /*
   * For a discussion of the signature of verifyNotNull, see the discussion above
   * Preconditions.checkNotNull.
   *
   * (verifyNotNull has many fewer "problem" callers, so we could try to be stricter. On the other
   * hand, verifyNotNull arguably has more reason to accept nullable arguments in the first
   * place....)
   */

  /**