} else {
                t.url = args[ai];
            }
        }

        Thread[] threads = new Thread[t.numThreads];
        int ti;

        for (ti = 0; ti < t.numThreads; ti++) {
            threads[ti] = new Thread(t);
            System.out.print(threads[ti].getName());
            threads[ti].start();
        }

        while (t.numComplete < t.numThreads) {
            long delay;

                    throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid threads core multiplier value: '" + threadConfiguration
                            + "'. Value must be positive.");
                }

                int procs = Runtime.getRuntime().availableProcessors();
                int threads = (int) (coreMultiplier * procs);
                return threads == 0 ? 1 : threads;
            } else {

    // Thread#setPriority() already checks for validity. These error messages
    // are nicer though and will fail-fast.
    checkArgument(
        priority >= Thread.MIN_PRIORITY,
        "Thread priority (%s) must be >= %s",
        priority,
        Thread.MIN_PRIORITY);
    checkArgument(
        priority <= Thread.MAX_PRIORITY,
        "Thread priority (%s) must be <= %s",
        priority,
        Thread.MAX_PRIORITY);

#### Do-stuff-later pool

Sometimes there's an action required like calling the application layer or responding to a ping, and the thread discovering the action is not the thread that should do the work. We enqueue a runnable on this executor and it gets handled by one of the executor's threads.

### Locks

            });
        }

        for (Thread th : threads) {
            th.start();
        }
        for (Thread th : threads) {
            th.join();
        }
        assertEquals(num, count.get());
        assertEquals(num, valueSet.size());

        Set<String> valueSet2 = Collections.synchronizedSet(new HashSet<>());
        threads = new Thread[threadNum];

        final Thread[] threads = new Thread[crawlerContext.getNumOfThread()];
        for (int i = 0; i < crawlerContext.getNumOfThread(); i++) {
            final CrawlerThread crawlerThread = crawlerContainer.getComponent("crawlerThread");
            crawlerThread.setCrawlerContext(crawlerContext);
            crawlerThread.setClientFactory(clientFactory);
            threads[i] =

    @Nonnull
    Optional<Boolean> alsoMakeDependents();

    /**
     * Returns the number of threads used for parallel builds.
     *
     * @return an {@link Optional} containing the number of threads (or "1C" for one thread per CPU core), or empty if not specified
     */
    @Nonnull
    Optional<String> threads();

    /**
     * Returns the id of the build strategy to use.
     *

    for (int i = 0; i < numThreads; i++) {
      threads[i] =
          new Thread() {
            @Override
            public void run() {
              assertSame(Boolean.TRUE, memoizedSupplier.get());
            }
          };
    }
    for (Thread t : threads) {
      t.start();
    }
    for (Thread t : threads) {
      t.join();
    }

    if (thrown.get() != null) {

    for (int i = 0; i < numThreads; i++) {
      threads[i] =
          new Thread() {
            @Override
            public void run() {
              assertSame(Boolean.TRUE, memoizedSupplier.get());
            }
          };
    }
    for (Thread t : threads) {
      t.start();
    }
    for (Thread t : threads) {
      t.join();
    }

    if (thrown.get() != null) {

  /**
   * When we need a new thread to run tasks, we call [Backend.execute]. A few microseconds later we
   * expect a newly-started thread to call [Runnable.run]. We shouldn't request new threads until
   * the already-requested ones are in service, otherwise we might create more threads than we need.
   *
   * We use [executeCallCount] and [runCallCount] to defend against starting more threads than we