3. **Flow**:
   - Review promptly to avoid blocking progress.
   - Balance quality and speed—minor issues can be addressed later via issues, not PR blocks.
   - If unable to complete the review, tag another reviewer (e.g., `@username please take over`).

4. **Shared Responsibility**:
   - All MinIO contributors are reviewers. The first commenter on a PR owns the review unless they delegate.

 * =============================================================================
 */

/** Extracts PR from commit message and creates a GitHub Issue on Rollback of PR
  Created issue is assigned to original PR owner and reviewer.

  @param {!object}
    github enables querying for PR and also create issue using rest endpoint
    context has the commit message details in the payload
  @return {string} Returns the issue number and title
*/

# consult https://www.iana.org/time-zones for the latest versions,
# update CODE and DATA below, and then run
#
#	./update.bash -commit
#
# That will prepare the files and create the commit.
#
# To review such a commit (as the reviewer), use:
#
#	git codereview change NNNNNN   # CL number
#	cd lib/time
#	./update.bash
#
# If it prints "No updates needed.", then the generated files
# in the CL match the update.bash in the CL.

**2. Valid?**

-   If the PR passes all the quality checks then we go ahead and assign a
    reviewer.
-   If the PR didn't meet the validation criteria, we request for additional
    changes to be made to PR to pass quality checks and send it back or on a
    rare occasion we may reject it.

**3. Review**

-   For a valid PR, reviewer (person familiar with the code/functionality)
    checks if the PR looks good or needs additional changes.

3. Ensure you have added or ran the appropriate tests for your PR: https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/devel/sig-testing/testing.md
4. If you want *faster* PR reviews, read how: https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md#best-practices-for-faster-reviews
5. If the PR is unfinished, see how to mark it: https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md#marking-unfinished-pull-requests
-->

    img: https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/img/sponsors/serpapi.png
  - url: https://www.greptile.com/?utm_source=fastapi&utm_medium=sponsorship&utm_campaign=fastapi_sponsor_page
    title: "Greptile: The AI Code Reviewer"
    img: https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/img/sponsors/greptile.png
silver:
  - url: https://databento.com/?utm_source=fastapi&utm_medium=sponsor&utm_content=display
    title: Pay as you go for market data

        <span class="sponsor-badge">sponsor</span>
        <img class="sponsor-image" src="/img/sponsors/serpapi-banner.png" />
      </a>
    </div>
    <div class="item">
      <a title="Greptile: The AI Code Reviewer" style="display: block; position: relative;" href="https://www.greptile.com/?utm_source=fastapi&utm_medium=sponsorship&utm_campaign=fastapi_sponsor_page" target="_blank">
        <span class="sponsor-badge">sponsor</span>

### Make a change in the build

There are a few guidelines to follow that should make your life easier to make changes to the elasticsearch build.
Please add a member of the `es-delivery` team as a reviewer if you're making non-trivial changes to the build.

#### Custom Plugin and Task implementations

<a href="https://www.greptile.com/?utm_source=fastapi&utm_medium=sponsorship&utm_campaign=fastapi_sponsor_page" target="_blank" title="Greptile: The AI Code Reviewer"><img src="https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/img/sponsors/greptile.png"></a>

you can just add incremental commits; this is generally easier on your
reviewers. If you need to pick up changes from master, you can merge
master into your branch. A reviewer might ask you to rebase a
long-running pull request in which case force pushing is okay for that
request. Note that squashing at the end of the review process should
also not be done, that can be done when the pull request is [integrated