* non-null, it should be reported to the user should all further attempts fail.
   *
   * The two values are independent: results can contain both (recoverable error), neither
   * (success), just an exception (permanent failure), or just a plan (non-exceptional retry).
   */
  data class ConnectResult(
    val plan: Plan,
    val nextPlan: Plan? = null,
    val throwable: Throwable? = null,
  ) {
    val isSuccess: Boolean

        errorResponse.status(Status.BAD_REQUEST);
        ApiResult result = errorResponse.result();

        assertNotNull(result);
        // Cannot directly access protected fields, just verify the result is not null
    }

    // Test configuration for JSON response
    public void test_configurationSettings() {
        ComponentUtil.setFessConfig(new FessConfig.SimpleImpl() {

        // BooleanQueryCommand doesn't seem to apply boost correctly,
        // so we'll just check that it has clauses
        assertTrue(boolQueryBuilder.boost() > 0);
        // Check that the boolean query has the correct number of clauses
        assertFalse(boolQueryBuilder.must().isEmpty());
        assertFalse(boolQueryBuilder.should().isEmpty());
        assertFalse(boolQueryBuilder.mustNot().isEmpty());

I say--that's the same thing, you know.'

  `Not the same thing a bit!' said the Hatter.  `You might just
as well say that "I see what I eat" is the same thing as "I eat
what I see"!'

  `You might just as well say,' added the March Hare, `that "I
like what I get" is the same thing as "I get what I like"!'

  `You might just as well say,' added the Dormouse, who seemed to

   *
   * Client configuration may be used to make follow-up decisions, such as:
   *
   *  * [OkHttpClient.followRedirects] must be true to follow redirects.
   *  * [OkHttpClient.followSslRedirects] must be true to follow redirects that add or remove HTTPS.
   *  * [OkHttpClient.authenticator] must respond to an authorization challenge.
   *
   * @param networkResponse the intermediate response that may require a follow-up request.

   *
   * <p>This method is useful primarily when we make a reflective call to a method with no {@code
   * throws} clause: Java forces us to handle an arbitrary {@link Throwable} from that method,
   * rather than just the {@link RuntimeException} or {@link Error} that should be possible. (And in
   * fact the static type of {@link Throwable} is occasionally justified even for a method with no

   *
   * <p>This method is useful primarily when we make a reflective call to a method with no {@code
   * throws} clause: Java forces us to handle an arbitrary {@link Throwable} from that method,
   * rather than just the {@link RuntimeException} or {@link Error} that should be possible. (And in
   * fact the static type of {@link Throwable} is occasionally justified even for a method with no

import java.time.temporal.ChronoField.SECOND_OF_MINUTE
import java.util.logging.Formatter
import java.util.logging.LogRecord

/**
 * Is Java8 Data and Time really this bad, or is writing this on a plane from just javadocs a bad
 * idea?
 *
 * Why so much construction?
 */
class OneLineLogFormat : Formatter() {
  private val d =
    DateTimeFormatterBuilder()
      .appendValue(HOUR_OF_DAY, 2)
      .appendLiteral(':')

    }

    @Override
    public void run() {
      while (true) {
        try {
          Thread.sleep(everyMillis);
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
          // ok. just stop sleeping.
        }
        if (shouldStop) {
          break;
        }
        interruptee.interrupt();
      }
    }

    void stopInterrupting() {
      shouldStop = true;
    }
  }

 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might someday be treated by a non-Android tool as a
 *       suppression. This would follow the precedent of many of our annotation processors, which
 *       look for any annotation named, e.g., "GwtIncompatible," regardless of package.
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might suggest to users that the test is suppressed