/*
     * We don't "need" to schedule a countDown() call at all here, but by doing
     * so, we come the closest we can to testing that the wait time is
     * appropriately decreased on each progressive await() call.
     */
    TimedLatch latch = new TimedLatch(/* countdownInMillis= */ LONG_DELAY_MS);
    repeatedlyInterruptTestThread(tearDownStack);
    latch.awaitUnsuccessfully(70);

        int originalSize = stopwordsFile.stopwordsItemList.size();
        StopwordsItem item = stopwordsFile.get(1).get();
        stopwordsFile.delete(item);

        // Verify the item count decreased
        // Note: get(1) may still return an item if IDs are reassigned
        assertTrue(stopwordsFile.stopwordsItemList.size() < originalSize);
    }

    // Test reload with InputStream
    @Test

- Memory limits could be decreased with a `NotRequired` resize restart policy. When decreasing memory limits,a best-effort check was performed to prevent limits from decreasing below usage and triggering an OOM-kill. ([#133012](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/133012),...

- InPlacePodVerticalScaling: Memory limits cannot be decreased unless the memory resize restart policy is set to `RestartContainer`. Container resizePolicy is no longer mutable. ([#130183](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/130183), [@tallclair](https://github.com/tallclair)) [SIG Apps and Node]

- Number of errors reported to the metric `storage_operation_duration_seconds_count` for emptyDir decreased significantly because previously one error was reported for each projected volume created. ([#117022](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/117022), [@mpatlasov](https://github.com/mpatlasov)) [SIG Storage]

* Time for attach/detach retry operations has been decreased from 10-12s to 2-6s ([#56974](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/56974), [@gnufied](https://github.com/gnufied))

### Auth

- Number of errors reported to the metric `storage_operation_duration_seconds_count` for emptyDir decreased significantly because previously one error was reported for each projected volume created. ([#117022](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/117022), [@mpatlasov](https://github.com/mpatlasov)) [SIG Storage]

  @CollectionFeature.Require(absent = SUPPORTS_ADD)
  public void testSetCount_oneToThree_unsupported() {
    assertSetCountIncreasingFailure(e3(), 3);
  }

  // Unconditional setCount size decreases:

  @CollectionSize.Require(absent = ZERO)
  @CollectionFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_REMOVE)
  public void testSetCount_oneToZero_supported() {
    assertSetCount(e0(), 0);
  }

  @CollectionFeature.Require(absent = SUPPORTS_ADD)
  public void testSetCount_oneToThree_unsupported() {
    assertSetCountIncreasingFailure(e3(), 3);
  }

  // Unconditional setCount size decreases:

  @CollectionSize.Require(absent = ZERO)
  @CollectionFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_REMOVE)
  public void testSetCount_oneToZero_supported() {
    assertSetCount(e0(), 0);
  }

	initial := timeout.Timeout()

	for range dynamicTimeoutLogSize {
		timeout.LogSuccess(20 * time.Second)
	}

	adjusted := timeout.Timeout()

	if initial <= adjusted {
		t.Errorf("Failure to decrease timeout, expected %v to be less than %v", adjusted, initial)
	}
}

func TestDynamicTimeoutDualDecrease(t *testing.T) {
	timeout := newDynamicTimeout(time.Minute, time.Second)

	initial := timeout.Timeout()