### Quotes and punctuation

1) Keep punctuation style consistent with existing Simplified Chinese docs (they often mix English terms like “FastAPI” with Chinese text).
2) Never change punctuation inside inline code, code blocks, URLs, or file paths.

### Ellipsis

1) Keep ellipsis style consistent within each document, prefer `...` over  `……`.
2) Never change ellipsis in code, URLs, or CLI examples.

### Preferred translations / glossary

### Grammar and tone

1) Use clear, concise technical Traditional Chinese consistent with existing docs.
2) Address the reader naturally (commonly using “你/你的”).

### Headings

1) Follow existing Traditional Chinese heading style (short and descriptive).
2) Do not add trailing punctuation to headings.

### Quotes and punctuation

### Grammar and tone

1) Use polite, instructional Korean (e.g. 합니다/하세요 style).
2) Keep the tone consistent with the existing Korean FastAPI docs.

### Headings

1) Follow existing Korean heading style (short, action-oriented headings like “확인하기”).
2) Do not add trailing punctuation to headings.

### Quotes

1) Keep quote style consistent with the existing Korean docs.

Doing this provides the following specific benefits:
- **Reduce the API surface** - We no longer need to maintain two methods.
- **Consistency** - All languages have consistent access to the same APIs and ergonomics in the DSL.
- **Reduce the size of the Gradle distribution** - We no longer need to carry multiple standard libraries for different languages.

## Decision

### Target language

Translate to Ukrainian (українська).

Language code: uk.

### Grammar and tone

1) Use polite/formal address consistent with existing Ukrainian docs (use “ви/ваш”).
2) Keep the tone concise and technical.

### Headings

1) Follow existing Ukrainian heading style; keep headings short and instructional.
2) Do not add trailing punctuation to headings.

### Quotes

* **Inconsistent API surface**: Public APIs with mixed spelling conventions appear less professional and polished
* **Harder for non-native speakers**: Contributors and users for whom English is a second language benefit from a single, consistent convention

While both American and British English are valid, establishing a single standard improves consistency, readability, and maintainability of the codebase.

        // Then - should be same instances
        assertSame(config1, config2, "Configuration should be consistent");
        assertSame(dfs1, dfs2, "DFS resolver should be consistent");
        assertSame(cache1, cache2, "Buffer cache should be consistent");
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Context should provide working resource creation")

- Exception types and messages
- Stream consumption (should not consume)
- Consistency across multiple calls

**Test Count**: 11 tests

**Key Scenarios**:
- ✅ Validates non-null streams
- ✅ Throws CrawlerSystemException for null
- ✅ Called during getText execution
- ✅ Does not consume or modify stream
- ✅ Consistent behavior across multiple calls
- ✅ Works with various InputStream types

---

            assertSame(mockConfig, result, "getConfig() should return the expected configuration");
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should maintain consistent getConfig return value")
        void shouldMaintainConsistentGetConfigReturn() {
            SmbSession mockSession = mock(SmbSession.class);
            Configuration mockConfig = mock(Configuration.class);

        assertEquals(0, DialectVersion.SMB302.compareTo(DialectVersion.SMB302));
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should return consistent ordinal values")
    void testOrdinalValues() {
        // Ordinal values should be consistent with enum declaration order
        assertTrue(DialectVersion.SMB1.ordinal() < DialectVersion.SMB202.ordinal());