// Then - should be same instances
        assertSame(config1, config2, "Configuration should be consistent");
        assertSame(dfs1, dfs2, "DFS resolver should be consistent");
        assertSame(cache1, cache2, "Buffer cache should be consistent");
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Context should provide working resource creation")

    public void test_getMessage_consistency() {
        // Test that getMessage returns consistent results
        String message = "Consistent message";
        JobNotFoundException exception = new JobNotFoundException(message);

        assertEquals(message, exception.getMessage());
        assertEquals(message, exception.getMessage()); // Call twice to verify consistency
        assertEquals(message, exception.getLocalizedMessage());
    }

        assertEquals(0, DialectVersion.SMB302.compareTo(DialectVersion.SMB302));
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should return consistent ordinal values")
    void testOrdinalValues() {
        // Ordinal values should be consistent with enum declaration order
        assertTrue(DialectVersion.SMB1.ordinal() < DialectVersion.SMB202.ordinal());

            assertSame(mockConfig, result, "getConfig() should return the expected configuration");
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should maintain consistent getConfig return value")
        void shouldMaintainConsistentGetConfigReturn() {
            SmbSession mockSession = mock(SmbSession.class);
            Configuration mockConfig = mock(Configuration.class);

		{"SHØRT", 49},
		{"There are far too many object names, and far too few bucket names!", 8},
		{"a/b/c/", 159},
		{"/a/b/c", 96},
		{string([]byte{0xff, 0xfe, 0xfd}), 147},
	}

	// Tests hashing order to be consistent.
	for i, testCase := range testCases {
		if sipHashElement := hashKey("SIPMOD", testCase.objectName, 200, testUUID); sipHashElement != testCase.sipHash {

	sum64 := siphash.Hash(k0, k1, []byte(key))
	return int(sum64 % uint64(cardinality))
}

// hashOrder - hashes input key to return consistent
// hashed integer slice. Returned integer order is salted
// with an input key. This results in consistent order.
// NOTE: collisions are fine, we are not looking for uniqueness
// in the slices returned.
func hashOrder(key string, cardinality int) []int {

        // Each call should return a new instance
        assertNotSame(option1, option2);
    }

    public void test_provideMappingOption_consistency() {
        // Test that multiple calls provide consistent configuration
        JsonMappingOption option1 = provider.provideMappingOption();
        JsonMappingOption option2 = provider.provideMappingOption();

        assertEquals(option1.getFieldNaming(), option2.getFieldNaming());

   * <p>The {@code hash} has the following properties:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>It is <i>consistent</i>: for any reference {@code x}, multiple invocations of {@code
   *       hash(x}} consistently return the same value provided {@code x} remains unchanged
   *       according to the definition of the equivalence. The hash need not remain consistent from
   *       one execution of an application to another execution of the same application.

# EditorConfig helps developers define and maintain consistent
# coding styles between different editors and IDEs
# editorconfig.org

root = true

[*]

indent_style = space
indent_size = 4


end_of_line = lf
charset = utf-8
trim_trailing_whitespace = true
insert_final_newline = true

# Markdown files sometimes need trailing whitespaces.
[*.md]
trim_trailing_whitespace = false

[*.{yml,yaml}]
indent_size = 2

        assertSame(first, second);
        assertSame(invertibleCryptographer, first);
    }

    public void test_providePrimaryInvertibleCryptographer_consistency() {
        // Test multiple calls return consistent results
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            InvertibleCryptographer cryptographer = securityResourceProvider.providePrimaryInvertibleCryptographer();
            assertNotNull(cryptographer);