}

  @Override
  public int size() {
    return Ints.saturatedCast(size);
  }

  @Override
  public int count(@Nullable Object element) {
    // isActuallyE checks for null, but we check explicitly to help nullness checkers.
    if (element == null || !isActuallyE(element)) {
      return 0;
    }
    Enum<?> e = (Enum<?>) element;
    return counts[e.ordinal()];
  }

  // Modification Operations

  }

  @Override
  public int size() {
    return Ints.saturatedCast(size);
  }

  @Override
  public int count(@Nullable Object element) {
    // isActuallyE checks for null, but we check explicitly to help nullness checkers.
    if (element == null || !isActuallyE(element)) {
      return 0;
    }
    Enum<?> e = (Enum<?>) element;
    return counts[e.ordinal()];
  }

  // Modification Operations

Use `Objects.requireNonNull` statement or `Preconditions` rather than `assert` or `@SuppressWarning` annotation to suppress if possible.

For gradual adoption, enable checks project-by-project.
Do not rely on `@NullMarked` annotations.
Only enable checks for a project if all its dependencies have checks enabled, in order to avoid back-and-forth when refining the annotations.

    return delegate().get(key, valueLoader);
  }

  /**
   * @since 11.0
   */
  @Override
  /*
   * <? extends Object> is mostly the same as <?> to plain Java. But to nullness checkers, they
   * differ: <? extends Object> means "non-null types," while <?> means "all types."
   */
  public ImmutableMap<K, V> getAllPresent(Iterable<? extends Object> keys) {
    return delegate().getAllPresent(keys);
  }

    return delegate().get(key, valueLoader);
  }

  /**
   * @since 11.0
   */
  @Override
  /*
   * <? extends Object> is mostly the same as <?> to plain Java. But to nullness checkers, they
   * differ: <? extends Object> means "non-null types," while <?> means "all types."
   */
  public ImmutableMap<K, V> getAllPresent(Iterable<? extends Object> keys) {
    return delegate().getAllPresent(keys);
  }

     * perform runtime null checks on the input and output. (That would also make NullPointerTester
     * happy!) However, since we didn't do that for many years, we're not about to start now.
     * (Runtime checks could be particularly bad for users of LegacyConverter.)
     *
     * Luckily, our nullness checker is smart enough to realize that `convert` has @PolyNull-like

   * possible with an unsafe cast which requires {@code keys} to actually be of type {@code K}.
   *
   * @since 11.0
   */
  /*
   * <? extends Object> is mostly the same as <?> to plain Java. But to nullness checkers, they
   * differ: <? extends Object> means "non-null types," while <?> means "all types."
   */
  @Override
  public ImmutableMap<K, V> getAllPresent(Iterable<? extends Object> keys) {

   * only contain entries which are already present in the cache.
   *
   * @since 11.0
   */
  /*
   * <? extends Object> is mostly the same as <?> to plain Java. But to nullness checkers, they
   * differ: <? extends Object> means "non-null types," while <?> means "all types."
   */
  ImmutableMap<K, V> getAllPresent(Iterable<? extends Object> keys);

  /**

     * perform runtime null checks on the input and output. (That would also make NullPointerTester
     * happy!) However, since we didn't do that for many years, we're not about to start now.
     * (Runtime checks could be particularly bad for users of LegacyConverter.)
     *
     * Luckily, our nullness checker is smart enough to realize that `convert` has @PolyNull-like

   * possible with an unsafe cast which requires {@code keys} to actually be of type {@code K}.
   *
   * @since 11.0
   */
  /*
   * <? extends Object> is mostly the same as <?> to plain Java. But to nullness checkers, they
   * differ: <? extends Object> means "non-null types," while <?> means "all types."
   */
  @Override
  public ImmutableMap<K, V> getAllPresent(Iterable<? extends Object> keys) {