app = FastAPI(
    servers=[
        {"url": "/", "description": "Default, relative server"},
        {
            "url": "http://staging.localhost.tiangolo.com:8000",
            "description": "Staging but actually localhost still",
        },
        {"url": "https://prod.example.com"},
    ]
)


@app.get("/foo")
def foo():
    return {"message": "Hello World"}


client = TestClient(app)

      value: >
        #### Ubiquity: provide concrete use cases


        Did you *actually* encounter the need for this feature in a real-world scenario, or is it
        just a feature that seems like a sensible addition to Guava?


        Before new features get added to Guava, we really want to be sure that it's for a use case
        that actually comes up in the real world. We want to hear the real-world use case so the

	returningRe := regexp.MustCompile(`(?i)RETURNING "id"`)
	actually = returningRe.ReplaceAllString(actually, ``)
	expected = returningRe.ReplaceAllString(expected, ``)

	actually = strings.TrimSpace(actually)
	expected = strings.TrimSpace(expected)

	if actually != expected {
		t.Fatalf("\nexpected: %s\nactually: %s", expected, actually)
	}
}

func replaceQuoteInSQL(sql string) string {

     * Note that this operation is only concerned about determining the coordinates of the transitive dependencies and
     * does not actually resolve the artifact files.
     *
     * @param session the {@link Session}, must not be {@code null}
     * @param root the Maven Dependency, must not be {@code null}

```

////

The last `CommonQueryParams`, in:

```Python
... Depends(CommonQueryParams)
```

...is what **FastAPI** will actually use to know what is the dependency.

It is from this one that FastAPI will extract the declared parameters and that is what FastAPI will actually call.

---

In this case, the first `CommonQueryParams`, in:

//// tab | Python 3.9+

```Python

  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: >
        Did you *actually* encounter the need for this enhancement in a real-world scenario, or does
        it just seem like a sensible behavior for the feature to have?


        Before we make significant changes to existing features in Guava, we really want to be sure
        that it's for a use case that actually comes up in the real world. We want to hear the

### `scope` { #scope }

The spec also says that the client can send another form field "`scope`".

The form field name is `scope` (in singular), but it is actually a long string with "scopes" separated by spaces.

Each "scope" is just a string (without spaces).

They are normally used to declare specific security permissions, for example:

The webhooks that you define will end up in the **OpenAPI** schema and the automatic **docs UI**.

/// info

The `app.webhooks` object is actually just an `APIRouter`, the same type you would use when structuring your app with multiple files.

///

        }
        msg += ")";
        logger.debug(msg);
    }

    @Override
    public void manageArtifactVersion(Artifact artifact, Artifact replacement) {
        // only show msg if a change is actually taking place
        if (!replacement.getVersion().equals(artifact.getVersion())) {
            String msg = indent + artifact + " (applying version: " + replacement.getVersion() + ")";
            logger.debug(msg);

 * @see Artifact
 */
@Experimental
public interface LocalRepositoryManager extends Service {

    /**
     * Gets the relative path for a locally installed artifact.
     * Note that the artifact need not actually exist yet at
     * the returned location, the path merely indicates where
     * the artifact would eventually be stored.
     *
     * @param session The session to use, must not be {@code null}.