tx.Statement.Model = nil
		}()
	}

	if selectClause, ok := db.Statement.Clauses["SELECT"]; ok {
		defer func() {
			tx.Statement.Clauses["SELECT"] = selectClause
		}()
	} else {
		defer delete(tx.Statement.Clauses, "SELECT")
	}

	if len(tx.Statement.Selects) == 0 {
		tx.Statement.AddClause(clause.Select{Expression: clause.Expr{SQL: "count(*)"}})

     * Ensures the target variant matches the request attributes and is consumable. This needs to be called
     * for variants that are selected by means other than attribute matching.
     *
     * Note: This does not need to be called for variants selected via attribute matching, since
     * attribute matching ensures selected variants are compatible with the requested attributes.
     */
    private void validateVariantAttributes(

apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
  name: selector-test-pod
  labels:
    name: selector-test-pod
    unique-label: bingbang
spec:
  containers:
  - name: kubernetes-pause

             * Creates a set that selects the artifacts from this set that match the given criteria.
             * Implementations are lazy, so that the selection happens only when the contents are queried.
             *
             * @param dependencySpec Select only those artifacts reachable from first level dependencies that match the given spec.
             */
            SelectedArtifactSet select(Spec<? super Dependency> dependencySpec);

# requirements to match.

[short] skip

env MODFMT='{{with .Module}}{{.Path}} {{.Version}}{{end}}'


# For this module, Go 1.16 selects the same versions of all explicit dependencies
# as Go 1.17 does. However, Go 1.16 selects a higher version of an *implicit*
# dependency, imported by a test of one of the (external) imported packages.

        return state == ComponentSelectionState.Selected;
    }

    public boolean isCandidateForConflictResolution() {
        return state.isCandidateForConflictResolution();
    }

    void evict() {
        state = ComponentSelectionState.Evicted;
    }

    void select() {
        state = ComponentSelectionState.Selected;
    }

    void makeSelectable() {

(ConstBool [t]) => (MOVDconst [b2i(t)])

// Carrying addition.
(Select0 (Add64carry x y c)) =>            (Select0 <typ.UInt64> (ADDE x y (Select1 <typ.UInt64> (ADDCconst c [-1]))))
(Select1 (Add64carry x y c)) => (ADDZEzero (Select1 <typ.UInt64> (ADDE x y (Select1 <typ.UInt64> (ADDCconst c [-1])))))
// Fold initial carry bit if 0.
(ADDE x y (Select1 <typ.UInt64> (ADDCconst (MOVDconst [0]) [-1]))) => (ADDC x y)

                    if (workItem == null) {
                        break;
                    }
                    Object selected = workItem.selection.getItem();
                    LOGGER.info("{} ({}) started.", selected, Thread.currentThread());
                    execute(selected, workItem.plan, workItem.executor);
                }

                if (releaseLeaseOnCompletion) {

The only attribute distinguishing these variants is 'extra'. Add this attribute to the consumer's configuration to resolve the ambiguity:
  - Value: 'extra 2' selects variant: 'bar'
  - Value: 'extra' selects variant: 'foo'"""
    }

    /**
     * If a configuration defines attributes, and that the target project declares configurations

				// TODO(bradfitz): rather than this best effort select, we
				// should probably start a goroutine to read from req. This best
				// effort select existed before the change to check 'deleted'.
				// But if we know for sure it wasn't deleted and a sender is
				// outstanding, we should probably block on req (in a new
				// goroutine) to get the connection back.
				select {
				default:
				case ret, ok := <-req: