headerConds = append(headerConds, fmt.Sprintf("%s=%s", key, renderStringMatch(val)))
		}
		retval += " when headers are " + strings.Join(headerConds, "; ")
	}

	// TODO QueryParams, maybe Gateways
	return strings.TrimSpace(retval)
}

func printPod(writer io.Writer, pod *corev1.Pod, revision string) {
	ports := []string{}
	UserID := int64(1337)
	for _, container := range pod.Spec.Containers {

         *
         * OK, it's technically possible for this to fail in the presence of unsafe publishing, as
         * discussed in the comments in TimeoutFuture. TODO(cpovirk): Maybe check for null before
         * calling recordOutputCancellation?
         */
        requireNonNull(localState).recordOutputCancellation(interruptIfRunning);
        return true;
      }
      return false;

    assertSame(t, popLoggedThrowable());
  }

  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): Can we replace makeLocalCache with a call to builder.build()? Some tests may
   * need access to LocalCache APIs, but maybe we can at least make makeLocalCache use
   * builder.build() and then cast?
   */

  private static <K, V> LocalCache<K, V> makeLocalCache(
      CacheBuilder<? super K, ? super V> builder) {

    assertSame(t, popLoggedThrowable());
  }

  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): Can we replace makeLocalCache with a call to builder.build()? Some tests may
   * need access to LocalCache APIs, but maybe we can at least make makeLocalCache use
   * builder.build() and then cast?
   */

  private static <K, V> LocalCache<K, V> makeLocalCache(
      CacheBuilder<? super K, ? super V> builder) {

            <multiplicity>*</multiplicity>
          </association>
        </field>
      </fields>
      <comment>We could probably have a specific element for a dev mailing list for things like CI,
        and maybe even a specific element for the user and scm mailing lists. Then leave the more
        lose structure for any other type of mailing list.</comment>
      <codeSegments>
        <codeSegment>

       * prototype checker's JDK. However, the checker still sees the return type as plain
       * `Enumeration<?>`, probably because of one of the following two bugs (and maybe those two
       * bugs are themselves just symptoms of the same underlying problem):
       *
       * https://github.com/typetools/checker-framework/issues/3030
       *