}
		}
	}
}

/*
 * Tool building
 */

// mustLinkExternal is a copy of internal/platform.MustLinkExternal,
// duplicated here to avoid version skew in the MustLinkExternal function
// during bootstrapping.
func mustLinkExternal(goos, goarch string, cgoEnabled bool) bool {
	if cgoEnabled {
		switch goarch {
		case "loong64", "mips", "mipsle", "mips64", "mips64le":

		}
		p.lastG = p.lastGs[p.lastP]
		p.lastTs = Timestamp(raw.args[1])
	case EvFrequency:
		p.ticksPerSec = int64(raw.args[0])
		if p.ticksPerSec <= 0 {
			// The most likely cause for this is tick skew on different CPUs.
			// For example, solaris/amd64 seems to have wildly different
			// ticks on different CPUs.
			return ErrTimeOrder
		}
	case EvTimerGoroutine:
		p.timerGoids[raw.args[0]] = true

  // because computed skew will be 3(3 - 0) if new Pod is scheduled to any of the three zones,
  // it will violate MaxSkew.
  // +optional
  optional int32 minDomains = 5;

  // NodeAffinityPolicy indicates how we will treat Pod's nodeAffinity/nodeSelector
  // when calculating pod topology spread skew. Options are:

	// for some point in time.
	// The problem is that mallocs come in real time, while frees
	// come only after a GC during concurrent sweeping. So if we would
	// naively count them, we would get a skew toward mallocs.
	//
	// Hence, we delay information to get consistent snapshots as
	// of mark termination. Allocations count toward the next mark
	// termination's snapshot, while sweep frees count toward the

	if err != nil {
		return nil, err
	}

	currTime := UTCNow()
	signature, err := signStreamingRequest(req, accessKey, secretKey, currTime)
	if err != nil {
		return nil, err
	}

	// skew the time between the chunk signature calculation and seed signature.
	currTime = currTime.Add(1 * time.Second)
	req, err = assembleStreamingChunks(req, body, chunkSize, secretKey, signature, currTime)
	return req, err
}

doesn't satisfy the spread constraint. - DoNotSchedule (default) tells the scheduler not to schedule it. - ScheduleAnyway tells the scheduler to schedule the pod in any location,\n  but giving higher precedence to topologies that would help reduce the\n  skew.\nA constraint is considered \"Unsatisfiable\" for an incoming pod if and only if every possible node assignment for that pod would violate \"MaxSkew\" on some topology. For example, in a 3-zone cluster, MaxSkew is set to 1, and pods with the same...

	// Even though RecoverVolumeExpansionFailure feature gate is enabled, it appears that we are running with older version
	// of resize controller, which will not populate allocatedResource and resizeStatus. This can happen because of version skew
	// and hence we are going to keep expanding using older logic.
	if resizeStatus == "" && allocatedResource == nil {

            "format": "int32",
            "type": "integer"
          },
          "nodeAffinityPolicy": {

- As of v1.25, the PodSecurity `restricted` level no longer requires pods that set .spec.os.name="windows" to also set Linux-specific securityContext fields. If a 1.25+ cluster has unsupported [out-of-skew](https://kubernetes.io/releases/version-skew-policy/#kubelet) nodes prior to v1.23 and wants to ensure namespaces enforcing the `restricted` policy continue to require Linux-specific securityContext fields on all pods, ensure a version of the `restricted` prior to v1.25...

- Support for proxying a request to a peer kube-apiserver if the local apiserver is not able to serve it due to version skew or in the case the requested api is disabled on the local apiserver ([#117740](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/117740), [@Richabanker](https://github.com/Richabanker)) [SIG API Machinery, Apps, Auth, Cloud Provider, Network, Node and...