// wanted value for KEEPCAPS.
			for k := 0; k < routines; k++ {
				question <- want
			}

			// At this point, we should have a large
			// number of locked OS threads all wanting to
			// reply.
			for k := 0; k < routines; k++ {
				if got := <-response; got != want {
					t.Errorf("[%d,%d,%d] waiter result got=%d, want=%d", i, j, k, got, want)
				}
			}

        return this;
    }

    @Override
    public void registerNode(ModelNodeInternal node, Multimap<ModelActionRole, ? extends ModelAction> actions) {
        // Disabled before 2.3 release due to not wanting to validate task names (which may contain invalid chars), at least not yet
        // ModelPath.validateName(name);

				}
			} else {
				if got.Method != "HEAD" {
					t.Errorf("Wrong method for destination: %q", got.Method)
				}
				gotURL := got.URL.String()
				wantURL := ts.URL + "/"
				if gotURL != wantURL {
					t.Errorf("Got URL %q, want %q", gotURL, wantURL)
				}
			}
		})
	}
}

func TestOnProxyConnectResponse(t *testing.T) {

	var tcases = []struct {
		proxyStatusCode int

	}
	w.ctx = nil
	w.done = true

	w.result <- connOrError{pc: pc, err: err, idleAt: idleAt}
	close(w.result)

	return true
}

// cancel marks w as no longer wanting a result (for example, due to cancellation).
// If a connection has been delivered already, cancel returns it with t.putOrCloseIdleConn.
func (w *wantConn) cancel(t *Transport, err error) {
	w.mu.Lock()

		if clientGone {
			// TODO: could we also get into this state if
			// the peer does a half close
			// (e.g. CloseWrite) because they're done
			// sending frames but they're still wanting
			// our open replies?  Investigate.
			// TODO: add CloseWrite to crypto/tls.Conn first
			// so we have a way to test this? I suppose
			// just for testing we could have a non-TLS mode.
			return false
		}