validations:
      required: true
  - type: textarea
    id: screenshot
    attributes:
      label: "Screenshot"
      description: "Please paste a screenshot of the page."
    validations:
      required: false
  - type: textarea
    id: what-did-you-do
    attributes:
      label: "What did you do?"

      return false;
    }

    if (!finalizeReference(firstReference, finalizeReferentMethod)) {
      return false;
    }

    /*
     * Loop as long as we have references available so as not to waste CPU looking up the Method
     * over and over again.
     */
    while (true) {
      Reference<?> furtherReference = queue.poll();
      if (furtherReference == null) {
        return true;
      }

      return false;
    }

    if (!finalizeReference(firstReference, finalizeReferentMethod)) {
      return false;
    }

    /*
     * Loop as long as we have references available so as not to waste CPU looking up the Method
     * over and over again.
     */
    while (true) {
      Reference<?> furtherReference = queue.poll();
      if (furtherReference == null) {
        return true;
      }

   * uniform, the actual concurrency observed may vary. Ideally, you should choose a value to
   * accommodate as many threads as will ever concurrently modify the table. Using a significantly
   * higher value than you need can waste space and time, and a significantly lower value can lead
   * to thread contention. But overestimates and underestimates within an order of magnitude do not

   * uniform, the actual concurrency observed may vary. Ideally, you should choose a value to
   * accommodate as many threads as will ever concurrently modify the table. Using a significantly
   * higher value than you need can waste space and time, and a significantly lower value can lead
   * to thread contention. But overestimates and underestimates within an order of magnitude do not

	if _, ok := newphis[b]; ok {
		h = b
	}
	change := newphis[h]
	x := change.before
	y := change.after

	// Apply rewrites to this block
	if x != nil { // don't waste time on the common case of no definition.
		p := &change.rewrites
		for _, v := range b.Values {
			if v == y { // don't rewrite self -- phi inputs are handled below.
				continue
			}
			for i, w := range v.Args {

   * uniform, the actual concurrency observed may vary. Ideally, you should choose a value to
   * accommodate as many threads as will ever concurrently modify the table. Using a significantly
   * higher value than you need can waste space and time, and a significantly lower value can lead
   * to thread contention. But overestimates and underestimates within an order of magnitude do not

   * uniform, the actual concurrency observed may vary. Ideally, you should choose a value to
   * accommodate as many threads as will ever concurrently modify the table. Using a significantly
   * higher value than you need can waste space and time, and a significantly lower value can lead
   * to thread contention. But overestimates and underestimates within an order of magnitude do not

		p.xnest++
		x := p.expr()
		p.xnest--
		p.want(_Rparen)

		// Optimization: Record presence of ()'s only where needed
		// for error reporting. Don't bother in other cases; it is
		// just a waste of memory and time.
		//
		// Parentheses are not permitted around T in a composite
		// literal T{}. If the next token is a {, assume x is a
		// composite literal type T (it may not be, { could be

  }

  /*
   * Note: All of this duplicate code sucks, but it saves a lot of memory. If only Java had mixins!
   * To maintain this code, make a change for the strong reference type. Then, cut and paste, and
   * replace "Strong" with "Soft" or "Weak" within the pasted text. The primary difference is that
   * strong entries store the key reference directly while soft and weak entries delegate to their