ztunClient.Close()
	// this will retry for a bit, so shouldn't flake
	mt.Assert(ztunnelConnected.Name(), nil, monitortest.Exactly(0))
}

func podAndNetns() (*v1.Pod, *fakeNs) {
	devNull, err := os.Open(os.DevNull)
	if err != nil {
		panic(err)
	}
	// we can't close this now, because we need to pass it from the ztunnel server to the client
	// it would leak, but this is a test, so we don't care
	//	defer devNull.Close()

          </tags>

          <!-- TODO(cpovirk): Move this to the parent after making the package-list files available there. -->
          <!-- We add the link ourselves, both so that we can choose Java 9 over the version that -source suggests and so that we can solve the JSR305 problem described below. -->
          <detectJavaApiLink>false</detectJavaApiLink>
          <offlineLinks>

          </tags>

          <!-- TODO(cpovirk): Move this to the parent after making the package-list files available there. -->
          <!-- We add the link ourselves, both so that we can choose Java 9 over the version that -source suggests and so that we can solve the JSR305 problem described below. -->
          <detectJavaApiLink>false</detectJavaApiLink>
          <offlineLinks>

It can't handle nested models very well. So, if the JSON body in the request is a JSON object that has inner fields that in turn are nested JSON objects, it cannot be properly documented and validated.

!!! check "Inspired **FastAPI** to"

      // the operation would be a no-op, so exceptions are allowed but not required
    }
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  @MapFeature.Require(absent = SUPPORTS_PUT)
  public void testReplaceEntry_unsupportedAbsentKey() {
    try {
      getMap().replace(k3(), v3(), v4());
    } catch (UnsupportedOperationException tolerated) {
      // the operation would be a no-op, so exceptions are allowed but not required
    }

	)
	// Create file watcher before checking for installation
	// so that no file modifications are missed while and after checking
	// note: we create a file watcher for each invocation, otherwise when we write to the directories
	// we would get infinite looping of events
	//
	// Additionally, fsnotify will lose existing watches on atomic copies (due to overwrite/rename),
	// so we have to re-watch after re-copy to make sure we always have fresh watches.

  private String suiteName;
  private @Nullable Runnable setUp;
  private @Nullable Runnable tearDown;

  // public so that it can be referenced in generated GWT tests.
  @Override
  public void setUp() throws Exception {
    if (setUp != null) {
      setUp.run();
    }
  }

  // public so that it can be referenced in generated GWT tests.
  @Override
  public void tearDown() throws Exception {
    if (tearDown != null) {

     * @param hostname The parameter value of hostname. (NotNull)
     */
    public void setHostname(String hostname) {
        registerVariable("hostname", hostname);
    }

    /**
     * Set the value of clustername, used in parameter comment. <br>
     * Even if empty string, treated as empty plainly. So "IF pmb != null" is false if empty.

* There's a subdirectory `app/routers/` with another file `__init__.py`, so it's a "Python subpackage": `app.routers`.
* The file `app/routers/items.py` is inside a package, `app/routers/`, so, it's a submodule: `app.routers.items`.
* The same with `app/routers/users.py`, it's another submodule: `app.routers.users`.
* There's also a subdirectory `app/internal/` with another file `__init__.py`, so it's another "Python subpackage": `app.internal`.

    // NOTE: If we ever want to use a custom executor here, have a look at CombinedFuture as we'll
    // need to handle RejectedExecutionException

    if (allMustSucceed) {
      // We need fail fast, so we have to keep track of which future failed so we can propagate
      // the exception immediately

      // Register a listener on each Future in the list to update the state of this future.