* @author Joshua O'Madadhain
 * @param <N> The most general node type this builder will support. This is normally {@code Object}
 *     unless it is constrained by using a method like {@link #nodeOrder}, or the builder is
 *     constructed based on an existing {@code Network} using {@link #from(Network)}.
 * @param <E> The most general edge type this builder will support. This is normally {@code Object}

 * order of the various views.
 *
 * <p>The views returned by {@link #column}, {@link #columnKeySet()}, and {@link #columnMap()} have
 * iterators that don't support {@code remove()}. Otherwise, all optional operations are supported.
 * Null row keys, columns keys, and values are not supported.
 *
 * <p>Lookups by row key are often faster than lookups by column key, because the data is stored in

   *
   * <p>Changes to the returned map or the collections that serve as its values will update the
   * underlying multimap, and vice versa. The map does not support {@code put} or {@code putAll},
   * nor do its entries support {@link Entry#setValue setValue}.
   */
  Map<K, Collection<V>> asMap();

  // Comparison and hashing

  /**

  @CollectionFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_REMOVE)
  public void testRemoveNegative() {
    try {
      getMultiset().remove(e0(), -1);
      fail("Expected IllegalArgumentException");
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException expected) {
    }
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  @CollectionFeature.Require(absent = SUPPORTS_REMOVE)
  public void testRemoveUnsupported() {
    try {

   * we wanted to support legacy classes that implement the raw type {@code Comparable} (instead of
   * implementing {@code Comparable<Foo>}) without producing warnings. If so, we would prefer today
   * to produce warnings in that case, and we may change this method to do so in the future. Support
   * for raw {@code Comparable} types in Guava in general is tracked as <a

 *   <dd>An extension of {@link java.util.Map} that guarantees the uniqueness of its values as well
 *       as that of its keys. This is sometimes called an "invertible map," since the restriction on
 *       values enables it to support an {@linkplain BiMap#inverse inverse view} -- which is another
 *       instance of {@code BiMap}.
 *   <dt>{@link Table}
 *   <dd>A new type, which is similar to {@link java.util.Map}, but which indexes its values by an

      // Expected.
    }
    assertInvariants(map);
  }

  public void testEntrySetSetValue() {
    // TODO: Investigate the extent to which, in practice, maps that support
    // put() also support Entry.setValue().
    if (!supportsPut) {
      return;
    }

    Map<K, V> map;
    V valueToSet;
    try {
      map = makePopulatedMap();

   * `new Integer` (as we do) instead of `Integer.valueOf`. However, under J2KT, `new Integer`
   * gets translated back to `Integer.valueOf` because that is the only thing J2KT can support. And
   * anyway, it's nice to avoid `Integer.valueOf` because the Android toolchain optimizes multiple
   * `Integer.valueOf` calls into one! So we stick with the deprecated `Integer` constructor.
   */

  /**
   * Returns a map view that associates each key with the corresponding values in the multimap.
   * Changes to the returned map, such as element removal, will update the underlying multimap. The
   * map does not support {@code setValue} on its entries, {@code put}, or {@code putAll}.
   *
   * <p>When passed a key that is present in the map, {@code asMap().get(Object)} has the same

import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.junit.runners.Parameterized;
import org.junit.runners.Parameterized.Parameters;

@AndroidIncompatible
// TODO(cpovirk): Figure out Android JUnit 4 support. Does it work with Gingerbread? @RunWith?
@RunWith(Parameterized.class)
public final class NetworkEquivalenceTest {
  private static final Integer N1 = 1;
  private static final Integer N2 = 2;