* change the behavior of {@link #equals}, which can lead to unexpected behavior. In this case, you
 * should override {@code equals} as well, either providing your own implementation, or delegating
 * to the provided {@code standardEquals} method.
 *
 * <p>Each of the {@code standard} methods, where appropriate, use {@link Objects#equal} to test

  /**
   * Creates an {@code ImmutableMap} backed by a JDK HashMap. Used when probable hash flooding is
   * detected. This implementation may replace the entries in entryArray with its own entry objects
   * (though they will have the same key/value contents), and will take ownership of entryArray.
   */
  static <K, V> ImmutableMap<K, V> create(

 * #add(Object, int)} alone <b>will not</b> change the behavior of {@link #add(Object)}, which can
 * lead to unexpected behavior. In this case, you should override {@code add(Object)} as well,
 * either providing your own implementation, or delegating to the provided {@code standardAdd}
 * method.
 *
 * <p>The {@code standard} methods and any collection views they return are not guaranteed to be

    assertNull(getMap().get(k1()));
    assertEquals(k1(), getMap().inverse().get(null));
    assertEquals(1, getMap().size());
  }

  // nb: inverse is run through its own entire suite

  @MapFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_PUT)
  @CollectionSize.Require(ZERO)
  public void testInversePut() {
    getMap().put(k0(), v0());
    getMap().inverse().put(v1(), k1());

            <!-- Even after we stop using JSR305 annotations in our own code, we'll want this link so that NullPointerTester's docs can link to @CheckForNull and friends... at least once we start using this config for guava-testlib. -->
            <offlineLink>

 * change the behavior of {@link #equals}, which can lead to unexpected behavior. In this case, you
 * should override {@code equals} as well, either providing your own implementation, or delegating
 * to the provided {@code standardEquals} method.
 *
 * <p>Each of the {@code standard} methods, where appropriate, use {@link Objects#equal} to test

    subject to change. They can be modified in any way, or even removed, at any
    time. If your code is a library itself (i.e., it is used on the CLASSPATH of
    users outside your own control), you should not use beta APIs unless you
    [repackage] them. **If your code is a library, we strongly recommend using
    the [Guava Beta Checker] to ensure that you do not use any `@Beta` APIs!**

are subject to change. They can be modified in any way, or even
removed, at any time. If your code is a library itself (i.e. it is
used on the CLASSPATH of users outside your own control), you should
not use beta APIs, unless you [repackage] them. **If your
code is a library, we strongly recommend using the [Guava Beta Checker] to
ensure that you do not use any `@Beta` APIs!**

   * AggregateFuture} attaches listeners that hold references to one or more inputs. And in the case
   * of {@link CombinedFuture}, the user-supplied callback usually has its own references to inputs.
   */
  /*
   * In certain circumstances, this field might theoretically not be visible to an afterDone() call
   * triggered by cancel(). For details, see the comments on the fields of TimeoutFuture.

   * type. That said, we could *accept* a `@Nullable T[]` (which, given that we treat arrays as
   * covariant, would still permit a plain `T[]`) and return a plain `T[]`. But of course that would
   * require its own suppression, since it is also unsound. toArray(T[]) is just a mess from a
   * nullness perspective. The signature below at least has the virtue of being relatively simple.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("nullness")