* already been re-added.
   */
  // Technically should accept RemovalNotification<? extends K, ? extends V>, but because
  // RemovalNotification is guaranteed covariant, let's make users' lives simpler.
  void onRemoval(RemovalNotification<K, V> notification);

   *
   * <p><b>Warning to users of Java 8+:</b> do not call any of the new <i>default methods</i> that
   * have been newly added to {@link ConcurrentMap}! These are marked with "Since: 1.8" in the
   * {@code ConcurrentMap} documentation. They will not function correctly and it is impossible for
   * Guava to fix them until Guava is ready to <i>require</i> Java 8 for all users.
   */
  ConcurrentMap<K, V> asMap();

  /**

        Be aware, though: most feature requests are not accepted, even if they're suggested by
        a full-time Guava team member. [Feedback](https://stackoverflow.com/a/4543114) from our
        users indicates that they really appreciate Guava's high power-to-weight ratio. It's
        important to us to keep Guava as easy to use and understand as we can. That means boiling

   * other {@code ClassValue} entries for the exception type to be tested. This lets us evaluate
   * whether our solution scales to use with multiple exception types and to whether it is affected
   * by other {@code ClassValue} users. Some of the benchmarked implementations don't use one or
   * both of these mechanisms, so they will be unaffected.
   */
  @Param({"0", "1", "12"})
  int otherEntriesInDataStructure;

     * have the same nullness as E." Since we can't, we declare it to return nullable elements, and
     * we can override it in our non-null-guaranteeing subtypes to present a better signature to
     * their users.
     *
     * However, the checker *we* use has this special knowledge about `Collection.toArray()` anyway,
     * so in our implementation code, we can rely on that. That's why the expression below
     * type-checks.

   * }
   * }</pre>
   *
   * ... can be replaced with:
   *
   * <pre>{@code
   * possibleFoo.ifPresent(foo -> doSomethingWith(foo));
   * }</pre>
   *
   * <p><b>Java 9 users:</b> some use cases can be written with calls to {@code optional.stream()}.
   *
   * @since 11.0
   */
  public abstract Set<T> asSet();

  /**

    executor.execute(task);
    assertEquals(1, numCalls.get());
  }

  /*
   * Under Android, MyError propagates up and fails the test?
   *
   * TODO(b/218700094): Does this matter to prod users, or is it just a feature of our testing
   * environment? If the latter, maybe write a custom Executor that avoids failing the test when it
   * sees an Error?
   */
  @AndroidIncompatible

 * that is already in the desired state.
 *
 * <p>When testing code that uses this class, use {@link #createUnstarted(Ticker)} or {@link
 * #createStarted(Ticker)} to supply a fake or mock ticker. This allows you to simulate any valid
 * behavior of the stopwatch.
 *
 * <p><b>Note:</b> This class is not thread-safe.
 *
 * <p><b>Warning for Android users:</b> a stopwatch with default behavior may not continue to keep

  }

  @SuppressWarnings("unused") // compilation test
  public void testSampleCodeFine2() {
    FluentIterable<? extends Number> numbers = getSomeNumbers();

    // Sadly, the following is what users will have to do in some circumstances.

    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // safe covariant cast
    Optional<Number> first = (Optional<Number>) numbers.first();
    Number value = first.or(0.5); // fine
  }

        // getDeclaredField to throw a NoSuchFieldException when the field is definitely there.
        // For these users fallback to a suboptimal implementation, based on synchronized. This will
        // be a definite performance hit to those users.
        thrownAtomicReferenceFieldUpdaterFailure = atomicReferenceFieldUpdaterFailure;
        helper = new SynchronizedHelper();
      }
    }