/**
   * Returns a fluent iterable that combines two iterables. The returned iterable has an iterator
   * that traverses the elements in {@code a}, followed by the elements in {@code b}. The source
   * iterators are not polled until necessary.
   *
   * <p>The returned iterable's iterator supports {@code remove()} when the corresponding input
   * iterator supports it.
   *
   * <p><b>{@code Stream} equivalent:</b> {@link Stream#concat}.

    ImmutableMap.Builder<String, Integer> builder = new Builder<>();
    final StringHolder holder = new StringHolder();
    holder.string = "one";
    Entry<String, Integer> entry =
        new AbstractMapEntry<String, Integer>() {
          @Override
          public String getKey() {
            return holder.string;
          }

          @Override
          public Integer getValue() {

      valueHolder.name = checkNotNull(name);
      return this;
    }

    // Holder object for values that might be null and/or empty.
    static class ValueHolder {
      @CheckForNull String name;
      @CheckForNull Object value;
      @CheckForNull ValueHolder next;
    }

    /**
     * Holder object for values that cannot be null or empty (will be printed unconditionally). This

 * Iterator#remove} operations. This utility takes the brute-force approach of trying <i>all</i>
 * possible sequences of these operations, up to a given number of steps. So, if the caller
 * specifies to use <i>n</i> steps, a total of <i>3^n</i> tests are actually performed.
 *
 * <p>For instance, if <i>steps</i> is 5, one example sequence that will be tested is:
 *
 * <ol>
 *   <li>remove();

   * themselves their proper values under GWT, since GWT's EnumMap does need the Class instance.
   *
   * Note that sometimes these fields *do* have correct values under J2CL: They will if the caller
   * calls `create(Foo.class)`, rather than `create(map)`. That's fine; we just shouldn't rely on
   * it.
   */
  transient Class<K> keyTypeOrObjectUnderJ2cl;
  transient Class<V> valueTypeOrObjectUnderJ2cl;

  /**

    return new MutableClassToInstanceMap<>(new HashMap<Class<? extends @NonNull B>, B>());
  }

  /**
   * Returns a new {@code MutableClassToInstanceMap} instance backed by a given empty {@code
   * backingMap}. The caller surrenders control of the backing map, and thus should not allow any
   * direct references to it to remain accessible.
   */
  public static <B extends @Nullable Object> MutableClassToInstanceMap<B> create(

    }
  }

  /**
   * Views the array as an immutable list. The array must have only {@code E} elements.
   *
   * <p>The array must be internally created.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // caller is reponsible for getting this right
  static <E> ImmutableList<E> asImmutableList(Object[] elements) {
    return unsafeDelegateList((List) Arrays.asList(elements));
  }

   * contention. See above for explanation. This method suffers the usual non-modularity problems of
   * optimistic retry code, relying on rechecked sets of reads.
   *
   * @param x the value
   * @param hc the hash code holder
   * @param wasUncontended false if CAS failed before call
   */
  final void retryUpdate(long x, @CheckForNull int[] hc, boolean wasUncontended) {
    int h;
    if (hc == null) {

   * in no particular order.
   *
   * <p>The returned array will be "safe" in that no references to it are maintained by this queue.
   * (In other words, this method must allocate a new array). The caller is thus free to modify the
   * returned array.
   *
   * <p>This method acts as bridge between array-based and collection-based APIs.
   *
   * @return an array containing all of the elements in this queue
   */

   *
   * <p>The returned array will be "safe" in that no references to it are maintained by this queue.
   * (In other words, this method must allocate a new array). The caller is thus free to modify the
   * returned array.
   *
   * <p>This method acts as bridge between array-based and collection-based APIs.
   *
   * @return an array containing all of the elements in this queue
   */