* @throws NullPointerException if both {@code first} and {@code second} are null
   * @since 18.0 (since 3.0 as {@code Objects.firstNonNull()}).
   */
  public static <T> T firstNonNull(@CheckForNull T first, @CheckForNull T second) {
    if (first != null) {
      return first;
    }
    if (second != null) {
      return second;
    }
    throw new NullPointerException("Both parameters are null");
  }

  /**

   * we've chosen to instead use a signature that benefits existing users -- and is still safe.
   *
   * For convertAll, I haven't looked as closely at *how* much existing users benefit, so we should
   * keep an eye out for problems that new users encounter. Note also that convertAll could support

      // We're looking for the smallest charsPerChunk such that bitsPerChar * charsPerChunk is a
      // multiple of 8. A multiple of 8 has 3 low zero bits, so we just need to figure out how many
      // extra zero bits we need to add to the end of bitsPerChar to get 3 in total.
      // The logic here would be wrong for bitsPerChar > 8, but since we require distinct ASCII
      // characters that can't happen.

 * follows:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>"{@code [group }<i>i</i>{@code , item }<i>j</i>{@code ]}" refers to the
 *       <i>j</i><sup>th</sup> item in the <i>i</i><sup>th</sup> equality group, where both equality
 *       groups and the items within equality groups are numbered starting from 1. When either a
 *       constructor argument or an equal object is provided, that becomes group 1.
 * </ul>
 *
 * @author Jim McMaster

 *
 * <p>This multimap allows duplicate key-value pairs. After adding a new key-value pair equal to an
 * existing key-value pair, the {@code ArrayListMultimap} will contain entries for both the new
 * value and the old value.
 *
 * <p>Keys and values may be null. All optional multimap methods are supported, and all returned
 * views are modifiable.
 *

import java.lang.reflect.Type;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;
import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * Unit tests of {@link TypeResolver}.
 *
 * @author Ben Yu
 */
@AndroidIncompatible // lots of failures, possibly some related to bad equals() implementations?
public class TypeResolverTest extends TestCase {

  public void testWhere_noMapping() {
    Type t = aTypeVariable();

  }

  /* ---------------- Local utilities -------------- */

  /** Most of the tests in this class run against every one of these caches. */
  private Iterable<LoadingCache<Object, Object>> caches() {
    // lots of different ways to configure a LoadingCache
    CacheBuilderFactory factory = cacheFactory();
    return Iterables.transform(
        factory.buildAllPermutations(),

  public void testCompare() {
    // max value
    assertThat(UnsignedLongs.compare(0, 0xffffffffffffffffL)).isLessThan(0);
    assertThat(UnsignedLongs.compare(0xffffffffffffffffL, 0)).isGreaterThan(0);

    // both with high bit set
    assertThat(UnsignedLongs.compare(0xff1a618b7f65ea12L, 0xffffffffffffffffL)).isLessThan(0);
    assertThat(UnsignedLongs.compare(0xffffffffffffffffL, 0xff1a618b7f65ea12L)).isGreaterThan(0);

    return new AndPredicate<T>(defensiveCopy(components));
  }

  /**
   * Returns a predicate that evaluates to {@code true} if both of its components evaluate to {@code
   * true}. The components are evaluated in order, and evaluation will be "short-circuited" as soon
   * as a false predicate is found.
   */

    }
  }

  /**
   * Asserts that {@code transformation} is diagonal (i.e. neither horizontal nor vertical) and
   * passes through both {@code (x1, y1)} and {@code (x1 + xDelta, y1 + yDelta)}. Includes
   * assertions about all the public instance methods of {@link LinearTransformation} (on both
   * {@code transformation} and its inverse). Since the transformation is expected to be diagonal,