* transitionService in the wrong order due to a race. Due to the fact that it is a race this test
   * isn't guaranteed to expose the issue, but it is at least likely to become flaky if the race
   * sneaks back in, and in this case flaky means something is definitely wrong.
   *
   * <p>Before the bug was fixed this test would fail at least 30% of the time.
   */

   *
   * <p>If {@code expectedSize} is exactly the number of entries added to the builder before {@link
   * Builder#build} is called, the builder is likely to perform better than an unsized {@link
   * #builder()} would have.
   *
   * <p>It is not specified if any performance benefits apply if {@code expectedSize} is close to,

    ImmutableSet<String> validIsatapAddresses =
        ImmutableSet.of(
            "2001:db8::5efe:102:304",
            "2001:db8::100:5efe:102:304", // Private Multicast? Not likely.
            "2001:db8::200:5efe:102:304",
            "2001:db8::300:5efe:102:304" // Public Multicast? Also unlikely.
            );
    ImmutableSet<String> nonIsatapAddresses =
        ImmutableSet.of(

        Object argValue = generate(paramType);
        if (argValue == null) {
          // When a parameter of a @Generates method cannot be created,
          // The type most likely is a collection.
          // Our distinct proxy doesn't work for collections.
          // So just refuse to generate.
          return null;
        }
        args.add(argValue);
      }

        }
      }
    }
    for (Invokable<?, ?> factory : factories) {
      factory.setAccessible(true);
    }
    // Sorts methods/constructors with the least number of parameters first since it's likely easier
    // to fill dummy parameter values for them. Ties are broken by name then by the string form of
    // the parameter list.
    return BY_NUMBER_OF_PARAMETERS
        .compound(BY_METHOD_NAME)

  }

  /**
   * Returns a {@code char} matcher functionally equivalent to this one, but which may be faster to
   * query than the original; your mileage may vary. Precomputation takes time and is likely to be
   * worthwhile only if the precomputed matcher is queried many thousands of times.
   *
   * <p>This method has no effect (returns {@code this}) when called in GWT: it's unclear whether a

        secondBarrier.await();
      }
    }

    @Override
    protected ScheduledExecutorService executor() {
      // use a bunch of threads so that weird overlapping schedules are more likely to happen.
      return Executors.newScheduledThreadPool(10);
    }

    @Override
    protected Scheduler scheduler() {
      return new CustomScheduler() {
        @Override

   * It's unclear whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix
   * will be to permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on
   * the other. Thus, we say the bug is in set(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection

   * It's unclear whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix
   * will be to permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on
   * the other. Thus, we say the bug is in add(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection

    reverse(array, fromIndex, toIndex);
  }

  /**
   * Reverses the elements of {@code array}. This is equivalent to {@code
   * Collections.reverse(Doubles.asList(array))}, but is likely to be more efficient.
   *
   * @since 23.1
   */
  public static void reverse(double[] array) {
    checkNotNull(array);
    reverse(array, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**