List<T> list = Arrays.asList(strictlyOrderedElements);

    // for use calling Collection.toArray later
    T[] emptyArray = Platform.newArray(strictlyOrderedElements, 0);

    // shoot me, but I didn't want to deal with wildcards through the whole test
    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
    Scenario<T> starter = new Scenario<>((Ordering<T>) ordering, list, emptyArray);
    verifyScenario(starter, 0);
  }

      // It's a weird formula, but tests prove it works.
      int adjust = size() - 1;
      for (int i = 0; i < axes.size(); i++) {
        adjust *= 31;
        adjust = ~~adjust;
        // in GWT, we have to deal with integer overflow carefully
      }
      int hash = 1;
      for (Set<E> axis : axes) {
        hash = 31 * hash + (size() / axis.size() * axis.hashCode());

        hash = ~~hash;
      }

        Did you *actually* encounter the need for this feature in a real-world scenario, or is it
        just a feature that seems like a sensible addition to Guava?


        Before new features get added to Guava, we really want to be sure that it's for a use case
        that actually comes up in the real world. We want to hear the real-world use case so the

    future2 = null;

    /*
     * Futures should be collected even if combiner never runs. This is kind of a silly test, since
     * the combiner is almost certain to hold its own reference to the futures, and a real app would
     * hold a reference to the executor and thus to the combiner. What we really care about is that
     * the futures are released once the combiner is done running. But we happen to provide this

    checkNotNull(str);
    return (format == this) ? str : convert(format, str);
  }

  /** Enum values can override for performance reasons. */
  String convert(CaseFormat format, String s) {
    // deal with camel conversion
    StringBuilder out = null;
    int i = 0;
    int j = -1;
    while ((j = wordBoundary.indexIn(s, ++j)) != -1) {
      if (i == 0) {
        // include some extra space for separators

   */
  /*
   * This test hangs (or maybe is just *very* slow) under Android.
   *
   * TODO(b/218700094): Ideally, get this to pass under Android. Failing that, convince ourselves
   * that the test isn't exposing a real problem with InterruptibleTask, one that could matter in
   * prod.
   */
  @AndroidIncompatible
  public void testInterruptIsSlow() throws Exception {

    suite.addTestSuite(ImmutableClassToInstanceMapTest.class);

    suite.addTest(
        MapTestSuiteBuilder.using(
                new TestClassToInstanceMapGenerator() {
                  // Other tests will verify what real, warning-free usage looks like
                  // but here we have to do some serious fudging
                  @Override
                  @SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "rawtypes"})

import com.google.common.annotations.J2ktIncompatible;
import com.google.errorprone.annotations.concurrent.LazyInit;
import javax.annotation.CheckForNull;

/**
 * The representation of a linear transformation between real numbers {@code x} and {@code y}.
 * Graphically, this is the specification of a straight line on a plane. The transformation can be
 * expressed as {@code y = m * x + c} for finite {@code m} and {@code c}, unless it is a vertical

    // Trigger any exception that the comparator would throw for the endpoints.
    /*
     * uncheckedCastNullableTToT is safe as long as the callers are careful to pass a "real" T
     * whenever they pass `true` for the matching `has*Bound` parameter.
     */
    if (hasLowerBound) {
      int unused =
          comparator.compare(

import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.Map.Entry;
import java.util.Set;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException;
import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * {@link LoadingCache} tests that deal with empty caches.
 *
 * @author mike nonemacher
 */

public class EmptyCachesTest extends TestCase {

  public void testEmpty() {
    for (LoadingCache<Object, Object> cache : caches()) {