@Override
  @SuppressWarnings("nullness") // should be safe, but not sure if we can avoid the warning
  public <S extends @Nullable T> Ordering<S> reverse() {
    // ordering.reverse() might be optimized, so let it do its thing
    return ordering.<T>reverse().<@NonNull S>nullsFirst();
  }

  @Override
  public <S extends @Nullable T> Ordering<@Nullable S> nullsFirst() {
    return ordering.<@NonNull S>nullsFirst();
  }

import java.nio.file.attribute.PosixFileAttributeView;
import java.nio.file.attribute.PosixFileAttributes;
import java.util.Arrays;

/**
 * Unit tests for {@link FileBackedOutputStream}.
 *
 * <p>For a tiny bit more testing, see {@link FileBackedOutputStreamAndroidIncompatibleTest}.
 *
 * @author Chris Nokleberg
 */
public class FileBackedOutputStreamTest extends IoTestCase {

   * {@code Ping-From}</a> header field name.
   *
   * @since 19.0
   */
  public static final String PING_FROM = "Ping-From";
  /**
   * The HTTP <a href="http://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/semantics.html#hyperlink-auditing">
   * {@code Ping-To}</a> header field name.
   *
   * @since 19.0
   */
  public static final String PING_TO = "Ping-To";

  /**
   * The HTTP <a

import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock;
import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantReadWriteLock;
import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * Unittests for {@link CycleDetectingLockFactory}.
 *
 * @author Darick Tong
 */
public class CycleDetectingLockFactoryTest extends TestCase {

  private ReentrantLock lockA;
  private ReentrantLock lockB;
  private ReentrantLock lockC;
  private ReentrantReadWriteLock.ReadLock readLockA;

     * crc2 = int2
     * crc3 = int3
     *
     * ...so we set crc0 so that computeForWord(crc0) = -1 and xoring it with the first int
     * gives us the desired result.  computeForWord(0) == 0, so all the others do the right thing.
     */
    private int crc0 = INVERSE_COMPUTE_FOR_WORD_OF_ALL_1S;
    private int crc1 = 0;
    private int crc2 = 0;
    private int crc3 = 0;

    @Override
    protected void process(ByteBuffer bb) {

   * even for funny strings composed by (possibly unmatched, and mostly illegal) surrogate
   * characters. (But doesn't test that they do the right thing - just their consistency).
   */
  private static void assertHashStringWithSurrogatesEquivalence(
      HashFunction hashFunction, Random random) {
    int size = random.nextInt(8) + 1;
    char[] chars = new char[size];