public void testConsumingIterable_queue_iterator() {
    final List<Integer> items = ImmutableList.of(4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42);
    new IteratorTester<Integer>(3, UNMODIFIABLE, items, IteratorTester.KnownOrder.KNOWN_ORDER) {
      @Override
      protected Iterator<Integer> newTargetIterator() {
        return Iterables.consumingIterable(Lists.newLinkedList(items)).iterator();
      }
    }.test();
  }

  public void testConsumingIterable_queue_iterator() {
    final List<Integer> items = ImmutableList.of(4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42);
    new IteratorTester<Integer>(3, UNMODIFIABLE, items, IteratorTester.KnownOrder.KNOWN_ORDER) {
      @Override
      protected Iterator<Integer> newTargetIterator() {
        return Iterables.consumingIterable(Lists.newLinkedList(items)).iterator();
      }
    }.test();
  }

   *
   * <p>The list of results is in the same order as the input list.
   *
   * <p>This differs from {@link #successfulAsList(ListenableFuture[])} in that it will return a
   * failed future if any of the items fails.
   *
   * <p>Canceling this future will attempt to cancel all the component futures, and if any of the
   * provided futures fails or is canceled, this one is, too.
   *
   * @param futures futures to combine

  }

  /**
   * Returns a splitter that behaves equivalently to {@code this} splitter but stops splitting after
   * it reaches the limit. The limit defines the maximum number of items returned by the iterator,
   * or the maximum size of the list returned by {@link #splitToList}.
   *
   * <p>For example, {@code Splitter.on(',').limit(3).split("a,b,c,d")} returns an iterable

    try {
      equalsTester.testEquals();
    } catch (AssertionFailedError e) {
      assertErrorMessage(
          e,
          equalObject1
              + " [group 1, item 1] must be Object#equals to "
              + notEqualObject1
              + " [group 1, item 2]");
      return;
    }
    fail("Should get not equal to equal object error");
  }

  /**

    // Each group is a List of items, each item has a list of factory args.
    final List<List<List<Object>>> argGroups = Lists.newArrayList();
    argGroups.add(ImmutableList.of(args, equalArgs));
    EqualsTester tester =
        new EqualsTester(
            new ItemReporter() {
              @Override
              String reportItem(Item<?> item) {

          mapEntry("five", collectionOf(5)));
    }

    // javac7 can't infer the type parameters correctly in samples()
    private static Collection<Integer> collectionOf(int item) {
      return ImmutableSet.of(item);
    }

    @Override
    public Map<String, Collection<Integer>> create(Object... elements) {
      ImmutableMap.Builder<String, Integer> builder = ImmutableMap.builder();

  //             Policy.setPolicy(permissivePolicy());
  //             System.setSecurityManager(new SecurityManager());
  //         }
  //         int iters = (args.length == 0) ? 1 : Integer.parseInt(args[0]);

  //         Test s = suite();
  //         for (int i = 0; i < iters; ++i) {
  //             junit.textui.TestRunner.run(s);
  //             System.gc();
  //             System.runFinalization();
  //         }

 *
 * <p>Advantages compared to {@code int[]}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>All the many well-known advantages of immutability (read <i>Effective Java</i>, third
 *       edition, Item 17).
 *   <li>Has the value-based (not identity-based) {@link #equals}, {@link #hashCode}, and {@link
 *       #toString} behavior you expect

   * list is a transformed view of {@code fromList}; changes to {@code fromList} will be reflected
   * in the returned list and vice versa.
   *
   * <p>Since functions are not reversible, the transform is one-way and new items cannot be stored
   * in the returned list. The {@code add}, {@code addAll} and {@code set} methods are unsupported
   * in the returned list.
   *