return new Iterator<Integer>() {
              @Override
              public void remove() {
                // We should throw here, but we won't!
              }

              @Override
              public Integer next() {
                // We should throw here, but we won't!
                return 0;
              }

              @Override
              public boolean hasNext() {

          #   - See https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action#publishing-results.
          # For private repositories:
          #   - `publish_results` will always be set to `false`, regardless
          #     of the value entered here.
          publish_results: true

      # Upload the results as artifacts (optional). Commenting out will disable uploads of run results in SARIF
      # format to the repository Actions tab.
      - name: "Upload artifact"

   */
  @Override
  protected void expectContents(Collection<E> expectedCollection) {
    List<E> expectedList = Helpers.copyToList(expectedCollection);
    // Avoid expectEquals() here to delay reason manufacture until necessary.
    if (getList().size() != expectedList.size()) {
      fail("size mismatch: " + reportContext(expectedList));
    }
    for (int i = 0; i < expectedList.size(); i++) {

  /**
   * Do interruptible work here - do not complete Futures here, as their listeners could be
   * interrupted.
   */
  @ParametricNullness
  abstract T runInterruptibly() throws Exception;

  /**
   * Any interruption that happens as a result of calling interruptTask will arrive before this
   * method is called. Complete Futures here.
   */

     * didn't see that discussed in the review, which included many other
     * changes: http://goo.gl/okTTdr
     *
     * TODO(cpovirk): decide what the best long-term action here is: force users
     * to suppress (as we do now), stop testing entrySet().add() at all, make
     * entrySet().add() tests tolerant of either behavior, introduce a map

  Logger get() {
    /*
     * We use double-checked locking. We could the try racy single-check idiom, but that would
     * depend on Logger not contain mutable state.
     *
     * We could use Suppliers.memoizingSupplier here, but I micro-optimized to this implementation
     * to avoid the extra class for the lambda (and maybe more for memoizingSupplier itself) and the
     * indirection.
     *

         its builds. Thus, GWT doesn't get j2objc-annotations transitively, in
         contrast to the other deps of `guava`, which it does get transitively.
         (Arguably we should redeclare *all* the `guava` deps here.) -->
    <dependency>
      <groupId>com.google.j2objc</groupId>
      <artifactId>j2objc-annotations</artifactId>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>com.google.guava</groupId>

  CollectionSize(int numElements) {
    this.implied = Collections.emptySet();
    this.numElements = numElements;
  }

  CollectionSize(Feature<? super Collection>... implied) {
    // Keep the order here, so that PerCollectionSizeTestSuiteBuilder
    // gives a predictable order of test suites.
    this.implied = Helpers.copyToSet(implied);
    this.numElements = null;
  }

  @Override

 * is a thin wrapper around {@link InetAddresses} and {@link InternetDomainName}; the unit tests for
 * those classes explore numerous corner cases. The intent here is to confirm that everything is
 * wired up properly.
 *
 * @author Craig Berry
 */
public final class HostSpecifierTest extends TestCase {

  private static final ImmutableList<String> GOOD_IPS =

  CollectionSize(int numElements) {
    this.implied = Collections.emptySet();
    this.numElements = numElements;
  }

  CollectionSize(Feature<? super Collection>... implied) {
    // Keep the order here, so that PerCollectionSizeTestSuiteBuilder
    // gives a predictable order of test suites.
    this.implied = Helpers.copyToSet(implied);
    this.numElements = null;
  }

  @Override