* all elements are so contained, {@code true} is returned, otherwise {@code false}.
   *
   * @param self a collection which might contain all elements in {@code c}
   * @param c a collection whose elements might be contained by {@code self}
   */
  static boolean containsAllImpl(Collection<?> self, Collection<?> c) {
    for (Object o : c) {

  }

  @LazyInit @RetainedWith @CheckForNull private transient ImmutableSetMultimap<V, K> inverse;

  /**
   * {@inheritDoc}
   *
   * <p>Because an inverse of a set multimap cannot contain multiple pairs with the same key and
   * value, this method returns an {@code ImmutableSetMultimap} rather than the {@code
   * ImmutableMultimap} specified in the {@code ImmutableMultimap} class.
   */
  @Override

   * and values are the result of applying the provided mapping functions to the input elements.
   * Entries appear in the result {@code ImmutableBiMap} in encounter order.
   *
   * <p>If the mapped keys or values contain duplicates (according to {@link
   * Object#equals(Object)}), an {@code IllegalArgumentException} is thrown when the collection
   * operation is performed. (This differs from the {@code Collector} returned by {@link

    int result =
        (configuredExpectedSize == Builder.UNSET_EXPECTED_SIZE)
            ? DEFAULT_CAPACITY
            : configuredExpectedSize;

    // Enlarge to contain initial contents
    if (initialContents instanceof Collection) {
      int initialSize = ((Collection<?>) initialContents).size();
      result = Math.max(result, initialSize);
    }

  }

  private static void assertHasTypeVariable(Type type) {
    try {
      TypeToken.of(type).rejectTypeVariables();
      fail("Should contain TypeVariable");
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException expected) {
    }
  }

  private static void assertNoTypeVariable(Type type) {
    TypeToken.of(type).rejectTypeVariables();
  }

    this.loggerName = ownerOfLogger.getName();
  }

  Logger get() {
    /*
     * We use double-checked locking. We could the try racy single-check idiom, but that would
     * depend on Logger not contain mutable state.
     *
     * We could use Suppliers.memoizingSupplier here, but I micro-optimized to this implementation
     * to avoid the extra class for the lambda (and maybe more for memoizingSupplier itself) and the

    assertTrue(
        "removeAll(intersectingCollection) should return true",
        getList().removeAll(MinimalCollection.of(duplicate)));
    assertFalse(
        "after removeAll(e), a collection should not contain e even "
            + "if it initially contained e more than once.",
        getList().contains(duplicate));
  }

  // All other cases are covered by CollectionRemoveAllTester.

    assertTrue(
        "removeAll(intersectingCollection) should return true",
        getList().removeAll(MinimalCollection.of(duplicate)));
    assertFalse(
        "after removeAll(e), a collection should not contain e even "
            + "if it initially contained e more than once.",
        getList().contains(duplicate));
  }

  // All other cases are covered by CollectionRemoveAllTester.

   * Creates a <i>mutable</i> {@code CompactLinkedHashSet} instance containing the elements of the
   * given collection in the order returned by the collection's iterator.
   *
   * @param collection the elements that the set should contain
   * @return a new {@code CompactLinkedHashSet} containing those elements (minus duplicates)
   */
  public static <E extends @Nullable Object> CompactLinkedHashSet<E> create(
      Collection<? extends E> collection) {

    try {
      getList().add(0, null);
      fail("add(n, null) should throw");
    } catch (NullPointerException expected) {
    }
    expectUnchanged();
    expectNullMissingWhenNullUnsupported("Should not contain null after unsupported add(n, null)");
  }

  @ListFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_ADD_WITH_INDEX)
  public void testAddAtIndex_negative() {
    try {
      getList().add(-1, e3());