* <p>Elements appear in the resulting set in the same order they were first added to the builder.
   *
   * <p>Building does not change the state of the builder, so it is still possible to add more
   * elements and to build again.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static class Builder<E> extends ImmutableCollection.ArrayBasedBuilder<E> {
    @VisibleForTesting @CheckForNull @Nullable Object[] hashTable;
    private int hashCode;

          // empty strings do not count towards the limit.
          end = toSplit.length();
          offset = -1;
          // Since we may have changed the end, we need to trim it again.
          while (end > start && trimmer.matches(toSplit.charAt(end - 1))) {
            end--;
          }
        } else {
          limit--;
        }

import junit.framework.AssertionFailedError;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;

/**
 * Tests for {@link AbstractFuture}.
 *
 * @author Brian Stoler
 */
public class AbstractFutureTest extends TestCase {
  public void testSuccess() throws ExecutionException, InterruptedException {
    final Object value = new Object();
    assertSame(
        value,

.tcerid,en??ude?v&dr,og???o&hp?m?v?yk??tol?ua??v&iv?lov??xas?ykot??p&a&ehc?g?m?s??eej?g!.&gro?ibom?moc?ossa?ppa,ten?ude???i&r!.nalc,?v?z??j!.&0o0o,a&3&5xq6f--nx?xqi0ostn--nx??5wtb6--nx?85uwuu--nx?9xtlk--nx?ad,b&ats,ihc!.&a&bihciakoy?don?ma&him?ye&ragan?tat???r&a&bom?gan?hihci??u&agedos?kas?ustak???s&os?ufomihs??t&amihcay?iran??w&a&g&im&anah?o??omak??kihci?zustum??ihsak??y&agamak?imonihci???e&akas?nagot??i&azni?esohc?h&asa?s&abanuf?ohc???ka&to?zok??musi?orihs?r&akihabihsokoy?o&dim?tak??ukujuk??us...

   * iteration, and hence return the same object each time. A subsequent call to {@code next} is
   * guaranteed to return the same object again. For example:
   *
   * <pre>{@code
   * PeekingIterator<String> peekingIterator =
   *     Iterators.peekingIterator(Iterators.forArray("a", "b"));
   * String a1 = peekingIterator.peek(); // returns "a"

 *
 * <p>The {@code Iterable} specification does not make it absolutely clear what should happen on a
 * second invocation, so implementors have made various choices, including:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>returning the same iterator again
 *   <li>throwing an exception of some kind
 *   <li>or the usual, <i>robust</i> behavior, which all known {@link Collection} implementations
 *       have, of returning a new, independent iterator
 * </ul>
 *

    assertTrue("Heap is not intact after remove", mmHeap.isIntact());
    assertEquals((Integer) 10, it.next());
    assertEquals((Integer) 3, it.next());
    it.remove();
    // After this remove, 400 moved down again and 500 up past the cursor
    assertTrue("Heap is not intact after remove", mmHeap.isIntact());
    assertEquals((Integer) 12, it.next());
    assertEquals((Integer) 30, it.next());
    assertEquals((Integer) 40, it.next());

   * iteration, and hence return the same object each time. A subsequent call to {@code next} is
   * guaranteed to return the same object again. For example:
   *
   * <pre>{@code
   * PeekingIterator<String> peekingIterator =
   *     Iterators.peekingIterator(Iterators.forArray("a", "b"));
   * String a1 = peekingIterator.peek(); // returns "a"