private void assertMapsEqual(Map<?, ?> expected, Map<?, ?> map) {
    assertEquals(expected, map);
    assertEquals(expected.hashCode(), map.hashCode());
    assertEquals(expected.entrySet(), map.entrySet());

    // Assert that expectedValues > mapValues and that
    // mapValues > expectedValues; i.e. that expectedValues == mapValues.
    Collection<?> expectedValues = expected.values();
    Collection<?> mapValues = map.values();

  private void assertMapsEqual(Map<?, ?> expected, Map<?, ?> map) {
    assertEquals(expected, map);
    assertEquals(expected.hashCode(), map.hashCode());
    assertEquals(expected.entrySet(), map.entrySet());

    // Assert that expectedValues > mapValues and that
    // mapValues > expectedValues; i.e. that expectedValues == mapValues.
    Collection<?> expectedValues = expected.values();
    Collection<?> mapValues = map.values();

       */
      String key = (String) requireNonNull(e.nextElement());
      /*
       * requireNonNull is safe because the key came from propertyNames...
       *
       * ...except that it's possible for users to insert a string key with a non-string value, and
       * in that case, getProperty *will* return null.
       *
       * TODO(b/192002623): Handle that case: Either:
       *

   * @since 11.0
   */
  @Override
  public ImmutableListMultimap<V, K> inverse() {
    ImmutableListMultimap<V, K> result = inverse;
    return (result == null) ? (inverse = invert()) : result;
  }

  private ImmutableListMultimap<V, K> invert() {
    Builder<V, K> builder = builder();
    for (Entry<K, V> entry : entries()) {
      builder.put(entry.getValue(), entry.getKey());
    }

  private void assertMapsEqual(Map<?, ?> expected, Map<?, ?> map) {
    assertEquals(expected, map);
    assertEquals(expected.hashCode(), map.hashCode());
    assertEquals(expected.entrySet(), map.entrySet());

    // Assert that expectedValues > mapValues and that
    // mapValues > expectedValues; i.e. that expectedValues == mapValues.
    Collection<?> expectedValues = expected.values();
    Collection<?> mapValues = map.values();

c?o&m?rit&-&d&eus&-&nitnert?onitnert??nitnert?onitnert??us&-&nitnert?onitnert??nitnert?onitnert??üs&-&nitnert?onitnert??nitnert?onitnert???s&-onitnert?onitnert???d&eus!-&n&asl&ab?ub??ezob?itnert??onitnert??nitnert?onitnert??us&-&n&asl&ab?ub??ezob?itnert??onitnert??nitnert?onitnert??üs!-&n&asl&ab?ub??ezob?itnert??onitnert??nitnert?onitnert???s&-onitnert?onitnert?????m&ac?f?i!t.nepo.citsalej.duolc,?ol?r??n&a!lim?sl&ab?ub???b?c?e!en.cj,v?zob??irut?m!p??p?r?t??o&a!v??b!retiv??c!cel??enuc?g!ivor??i&d...

    }
    assertIntact(mmHeap);
    assertEquals(heapSize, mmHeap.size());
    int currentHeapSize = heapSize;
    for (int i = 0; i < numberOfModifications; i++) {
      if (random.nextBoolean()) {
        /* insert a new element */
        int randomInt = random.nextInt();
        mmHeap.offer(randomInt);
        insertIntoReplica(replica, randomInt);
        currentHeapSize++;
      } else {

            c.g.c.base.testModule transitively pulls in .java files from both modules while reading
            the module description of only the prod module. And the prod module doesn't inherit all
            the modules that the test module classes use, so we get errors.

            The good news is that, despite ignoring errors here, GWT does fail if any errors affect