uses: actions/setup-java@99b8673ff64fbf99d8d325f52d9a5bdedb8483e9 # v4.2.1

        with:
          java-version: ${{ matrix.java }}
          distribution: 'zulu'
          cache: 'maven'
      - name: 'Install'
        shell: bash
        run: ./mvnw -B -Dorg.slf4j.simpleLogger.log.org.apache.maven.cli.transfer.Slf4jMavenTransferListener=warn install -U -DskipTests=true -f $ROOT_POM
      - name: 'Test'

  public SampleElements<Entry<String, String>> samples() {
    return new SampleElements<>(
        Helpers.mapEntry("one", "January"),
        Helpers.mapEntry("two", "February"),
        Helpers.mapEntry("three", "March"),
        Helpers.mapEntry("four", "April"),
        Helpers.mapEntry("five", "May"));
  }

  @Override
  public final BiMap<String, String> create(Object... entries) {
    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")

 * or implied. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under
 * the License.
 */

package com.google.common.cache;

import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkArgument;
import static com.google.common.base.Strings.isNullOrEmpty;

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtIncompatible;

        .addEqualityGroup(isNull)
        .addEqualityGroup(Equivalence.identity().equivalentTo("1"))
        .testEquals();
  }

  /*
   * We use large numbers to avoid the integer cache. Normally, we'd accomplish that merely by using
   * `new Integer` (as we do) instead of `Integer.valueOf`. However, under J2KT, `new Integer`

   * ImmutableList.copyOf} and use that list instead.
   */
  public List<Integer> asList() {
    /*
     * Typically we cache this kind of thing, but much repeated use of this view is a performance
     * anti-pattern anyway. If we cache, then everyone pays a price in memory footprint even if
     * they never use this method.
     */
    return new AsList(this);
  }

   * ImmutableList.copyOf} and use that list instead.
   */
  public List<Double> asList() {
    /*
     * Typically we cache this kind of thing, but much repeated use of this view is a performance
     * anti-pattern anyway. If we cache, then everyone pays a price in memory footprint even if
     * they never use this method.
     */
    return new AsList(this);
  }

      int expectedSize) {
    return new CompactLinkedHashSet<>(expectedSize);
  }

  private static final int ENDPOINT = -2;

  // TODO(user): predecessors and successors should be collocated (reducing cache misses).
  // Might also explore collocating all of [hash, next, predecessor, successor] fields of an
  // entry in a *single* long[], though that reduces the maximum size of the set by a factor of 2

  /**

  /** Discards all entries in the cache. */
  void invalidateAll();

  /** Returns the approximate number of entries in this cache. */
  long size();

  /**
   * Returns a current snapshot of this cache's cumulative statistics, or a set of default values if
   * the cache is not recording statistics. All statistics begin at zero and never decrease over the
   * lifetime of the cache.
   *

        allowedPriorLocks.put(acquiredLock, new ExampleStackTrace(acquiredLock, this));
      } else {
        // Unsafe acquisition order detected. Create and cache a
        // PotentialDeadlockException.
        PotentialDeadlockException exception =
            new PotentialDeadlockException(acquiredLock, this, path);
        disallowedPriorLocks.put(acquiredLock, exception);

  }

  @Override
  public ImmutableSortedMap<K, V> descendingMap() {
    // TODO(kevinb): The descendingMap is never actually cached at all. Either:
    //
    // - Cache it, and annotate the field with @LazyInit.
    // - Simplify the code below, and consider eliminating the field (b/287198172), which is also
    //   set by one of the constructors.