* TODO(cpovirk): use Object[] instead of E[] in the mainline? (The backport is different and
     * doesn't need this suppression, but we keep it to minimize diffs.) Generally be more clear
     * about when we have an Object[] vs. a Comparable[] or other array type in internalArray? If we
     * used Object[], we might be able to optimize toArray() to use clone() sometimes. (See
     * cl/592273615 and cl/592273683.)
     */

        Entry<?> entry = (Entry<?>) object;
        Object element = entry.getElement();
        int entryCount = entry.getCount();
        if (entryCount != 0) {
          // Safe as long as we never add a new entry, which we won't.
          // (Presumably it can still throw CCE/NPE but only if the underlying Multiset does.)
          @SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "nullness"})

          // We're careful to put only K instances in.
          K[] sortedKs = (K[]) sortedKeys;
          Arrays.sort(sortedKs, comparator);
          Object[] sortedValues = new Object[size];

          // We might, somehow, be able to reorder values in-place.  But it doesn't seem like
          // there's a way around creating the separate sortedKeys array, and if we're allocating

   * {@code [1]} and {@code [1, 1]}).
   */
  // Note: 90% of the time we don't add type parameters or wildcards that serve only to "tweak" the
  // desired return type. However, *nested* generics introduce a special class of problems that we
  // think tip it over into being worthwhile.
  public static <T extends @Nullable Object, S extends T> Comparator<Iterable<S>> lexicographical(

     *
     * Two other points:
     *
     * 1. We'll want to use something like @PolyNull once we can make that work for the various
     * platforms we target.
     *
     * 2. Kotlin's Map type has a getOrDefault method that accepts and returns a "plain V," in
     * contrast to the "V?" type that we're using. As a result, Kotlin sees a conflict between the

    plans to start removing things again, but officially, we're leaving our
    options open in case of surprises (like, say, a serious security problem).

3.  Guava has one dependency that is needed for linkage at runtime:
    `com.google.guava:failureaccess:1.0.2`. It also has
    [some annotation-only dependencies][guava-deps], which we discuss in more
    detail at that link.

    }

    @Override
    public boolean contains(@CheckForNull Object o) {
      if (o == null) {
        return false;
      }
      try {
        @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // we catch CCE's
        C c = (C) o;
        return ImmutableRangeSet.this.contains(c);
      } catch (ClassCastException e) {
        return false;
      }
    }

    @Override

      // Warning: this is broken if size() == 0, so it is critical that we
      // substitute an empty ImmutableSet to the user in place of this

      // It's a weird formula, but tests prove it works.
      int adjust = size() - 1;
      for (int i = 0; i < axes.size(); i++) {
        adjust *= 31;
        adjust = ~~adjust;
        // in GWT, we have to deal with integer overflow carefully
      }
      int hash = 1;

   * @since 31.0
   */
  @SafeVarargs
  public static <K, V> ImmutableBiMap<K, V> ofEntries(Entry<? extends K, ? extends V>... entries) {
    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // we will only ever read these
    Entry<K, V>[] entries2 = (Entry<K, V>[]) entries;
    return copyOf(Arrays.asList(entries2));
  }

  /**

@IgnoreJRERequirement // Users will use this only if they're already using streams.
@Beta // TODO: b/288085449 - Remove.
public final class MoreCollectors {

  /*
   * TODO(lowasser): figure out if we can convert this to a concurrent AtomicReference-based
   * collector without breaking j2cl?
   */
  private static final Collector<Object, ?, Optional<Object>> TO_OPTIONAL =
      Collector.of(
          ToOptionalState::new,