<type>String</type>
          <description>The groupId when this directory represents "groupId/artifactId" or "groupId/artifactId/version".</description>
        </field>
        <field>
          <name>artifactId</name>
          <version>1.0.0+</version>
          <type>String</type>
          <description>The artifactId when this directory represents "groupId/artifactId" or "groupId/artifactId/version".</description>

  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see https://goo.gl/pRV3Yn for details.

  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see https://goo.gl/pRV3Yn for details.

  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see https://goo.gl/pRV3Yn for details.

  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see https://goo.gl/pRV3Yn for details.

          <description><![CDATA[
            Specifies that this profile will be activated when a matching JDK is detected.
          ]]></description>
        </field>
        <field>
          <name>os</name>
          <version>1.0.0</version>
          <description><![CDATA[
            Specifies that this profile will be activated when matching OS attributes are detected.
          ]]></description>
          <association>

          <description>
            The permissions for files when they are created.
          </description>
          <type>String</type>
        </field>
        <field>
          <name>directoryPermissions</name>
          <version>1.0.0+</version>
          <description>
            The permissions for directories when they are created.
          </description>
          <type>String</type>

  <artifactId>test</artifactId>
  <version>0.1</version>
  <packaging>jar</packaging>

  <name>Maven Integration Test :: MNG-4283</name>
  <description>
    Test that the model builder fails when a parent POM has not "pom" packaging.
  </description>

                    <contains text="@GwtCompatible"/>
                  </fileset>
                </copy>
                <!-- TODO(cpovirk): If we continue stripping these once we use @ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault, then we should strip @ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault, too, to reflect that the classes are *not* fully annotated. But hopefully we can stop stripping them, as https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify/issues/184 should make possible. -->

  </description>

  <properties>
    <overridden>PARENT</overridden>
    <!-- Test the effective value of this property in the child when "overridden" is defined by child as well -->
    <interpolated>${overridden}</interpolated>
  </properties>

  <profiles>
    <profile>
      <id>it-parent</id>
      <activation>