* known-non-null type? But that particular problem might not arise here, since we're not
     * actually reading from the fields in any case in which they might be null (as proven by the
     * requireNonNull checks below). Plus, we're *already* lying here, since newHeader passes a null
     * key and value, which we pass to the superconstructor, even though the key and value type for

     * known-non-null type? But that particular problem might not arise here, since we're not
     * actually reading from the fields in any case in which they might be null (as proven by the
     * requireNonNull checks below). Plus, we're *already* lying here, since newHeader passes a null
     * key and value, which we pass to the superconstructor, even though the key and value type for

 *
 * <p>A non-null {@code Optional<T>} reference can be used as a replacement for a nullable {@code T}
 * reference. It allows you to represent "a {@code T} that must be present" and a "a {@code T} that
 * might be absent" as two distinct types in your program, which can aid clarity.
 *
 * <p>Some uses of this class include
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>As a method return type, as an alternative to returning {@code null} to indicate that no

 *
 * <p>A min-max priority queue can be configured with a maximum size. If so, each time the size of
 * the queue exceeds that value, the queue automatically removes its greatest element according to
 * its comparator (which might be the element that was just added). This is different from
 * conventional bounded queues, which either block or reject new elements when full.
 *
 * <p>This implementation is based on the <a

  public static final Integer four = 4;
  public static final Integer five = 5;
  public static final Integer six = 6;
  public static final Integer seven = 7;
  public static final Integer eight = 8;
  public static final Integer nine = 9;
  public static final Integer m1 = -1;
  public static final Integer m2 = -2;
  public static final Integer m3 = -3;
  public static final Integer m4 = -4;

    input.addListener(future, rejectionPropagatingExecutor(executor, future));
    return future;
  }

  /*
   * In certain circumstances, this field might theoretically not be visible to an afterDone() call
   * triggered by cancel(). For details, see the comments on the fields of TimeoutFuture.
   */
  @CheckForNull @LazyInit ListenableFuture<? extends V> inputFuture;

  @Override
  public void write(char[] cbuf, int off, int len) throws IOException {
    checkNotClosed();
    // It turns out that creating a new String is usually as fast, or faster
    // than wrapping cbuf in a light-weight CharSequence.
    target.append(new String(cbuf, off, len));
  }

  /*
   * Override a few functions for performance reasons to avoid creating unnecessary strings.
   */

  @Override

      boolean isPossibleChainingCall = interfaceType.isAssignableFrom(method.getReturnType());
      try {
        Object actualReturnValue = method.invoke(wrapper, passedArgs);
        // If we think this might be a 'chaining' call then we allow the return value to either
        // be the wrapper or the returnValue.
        if (!isPossibleChainingCall || wrapper != actualReturnValue) {
          assertEquals(

  private final transient int size;

  /*
   * We have some considerable complexity in these create methods because of
   * Builder.buildKeepingLast(). The same Builder might be called with buildKeepingLast() and then
   * buildOrThrow(), or vice versa. So in particular, if we modify alternatingKeysAndValues to
   * eliminate duplicate keys (for buildKeepingLast()) then we have to ensure that a later call to

        end = srcIndex + rDataLength;
/* Apparently readRDataWireFormat can return 0 if resultCode != 0 in
which case this will look indefinitely. Putting this else clause around
the loop might fix that. But I would need to see a capture to confirm.
if (resultCode != 0) {
    srcIndex += rDataLength;
} else {
*/
        for( addrIndex = 0; srcIndex < end; addrIndex++ ) {