for (int aHigh = 0; aHigh < 6; aHigh++) {
        for (BoundType aLowType : BoundType.values()) {
          for (BoundType aHighType : BoundType.values()) {
            if ((aLow == aHigh && aLowType == OPEN && aHighType == OPEN) || aLow > aHigh) {
              continue;
            }
            for (int bLow = 0; bLow < 6; bLow++) {
              for (int bHigh = 0; bHigh < 6; bHigh++) {

    static final int FLAGS_COPY_SOURCE_MODE_ASCII = 0x0008;
    static final int FLAGS_VERIFY_ALL_WRITES = 0x0010;
    static final int FLAGS_TREE_COPY = 0x0020;

    // open function
    static final int OPEN_FUNCTION_FAIL_IF_EXISTS = 0x0000;
    static final int OPEN_FUNCTION_OVERWRITE_IF_EXISTS = 0x0020;

    static final int SECURITY_SHARE = 0x00;
    static final int SECURITY_USER = 0x01;

    static final int CMD_OFFSET = 4;

    }

    @Override
    BoundType typeAsUpperBound() {
      return BoundType.OPEN;
    }

    @Override
    Cut<C> withLowerBoundType(BoundType boundType, DiscreteDomain<C> domain) {
      switch (boundType) {
        case CLOSED:
          return this;
        case OPEN:
          C previous = domain.previous(endpoint);

have exclusive access to the file. An additional open command
from jCIFS or another application will fail with the "file is being
accessed by another process" error. The <code>FILE_SHARE_READ</code>,
<code>FILE_SHARE_WRITE</code>, and <code>FILE_SHARE_DELETE</code> may be
combined with the bitwise OR '|' to specify that other peocesses may read,
write, and/or delete the file while the jCIFS user has the file open.
 * 

    }


    /**
     * @return whether the stream is open
     */
    public boolean isOpen () {
        return this.handle != null && this.handle.isValid();
    }


    protected synchronized SmbFileHandleImpl ensureOpen () throws CIFSException {
        if ( !isOpen() ) {
            // one extra acquire to keep this open till the stream is released

 * limitations under the License.
 */

package com.google.common.io;

import static com.google.common.io.TestOption.CLOSE_THROWS;
import static com.google.common.io.TestOption.OPEN_THROWS;
import static com.google.common.io.TestOption.READ_THROWS;
import static com.google.common.io.TestOption.WRITE_THROWS;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertArrayEquals;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertThrows;

 *       that we could probably work around. Or we could manually strip the test from open-source
 *       Guava while continuing to run it internally, as we do with many other tests. This would
 *       suffice because we our Android users and tests are using the open-source version, which
 *       would no longer have the problematic test. But why bother when we can instead strip it with

   * with linear probing in its implementation. The returned size is the smallest power of two that
   * can hold setSize elements with the desired load factor.
   */
  @VisibleForTesting
  static int chooseTableSize(int setSize) {
    if (setSize == 1) {
      return 2;
    }
    // Correct the size for open addressing to match desired load factor.

 * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
 * limitations under the License.
 */

/**
 * Testing utilities. This package is a part of the open-source <a
 * href="https://github.com/google/guava">Guava</a> library.
 */
@com.google.errorprone.annotations.CheckReturnValue
@javax.annotation.ParametersAreNonnullByDefault

 * limitations under the License.
 */

/**
 * Testing utilities for use in tests of {@code com.google.common.escape}.
 *
 * <p>This package is a part of the open-source <a href="https://github.com/google/guava">Guava</a>
 * library.
 */
@CheckReturnValue
package com.google.common.escape.testing;