* for technical reasons, it is not part of the public API. In particular, this method can be changed or deleted
     * without prior notice and must not be used by plugins.
     *
     * @param classRealm The class realm hosting the build extensions of this project, may be {@code null}.
     */
    public void setClassRealm(ClassRealm classRealm) {
        this.classRealm = classRealm;
    }

   * can therefore be converted safely to integers (for whatever purpose) this function can be used
   * to handle IPv6 addresses as well until the application is suitably fixed.
   *
   * <p>NOTE: an IPv6 address coerced to an IPv4 address can only be used for such purposes as
   * rudimentary identification or indexing into a collection of real {@link InetAddress}es. They

     * @param pluginGroups The list of group ids to scan for the plugin prefix, may be {@code null}.
     * @return This request, never {@code null}.
     */
    PluginPrefixRequest setPluginGroups(List<String> pluginGroups);

    /**
     * Gets the POM whose build plugins are to be scanned for the prefix.
     *
     * @return The POM whose build plugins are to be scanned for the prefix or {@code null} to only search the plugin

   *
   * <p><b>Java 7+ users:</b> this constant should be treated as deprecated; use {@link
   * java.nio.charset.StandardCharsets#ISO_8859_1} instead.
   *
   */
  public static final Charset ISO_8859_1 = Charset.forName("ISO-8859-1");

  /**
   * UTF-8: eight-bit UCS Transformation Format.
   *
   * <p><b>Java 7+ users:</b> this constant should be treated as deprecated; use {@link

  }

  /**
   * Returns a {@code HostSpecifier} built from the provided {@code specifier}, which is already
   * known to be valid. If the {@code specifier} might be invalid, use {@link #from(String)}
   * instead.
   *
   * <p>The specifier must be in one of these formats:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>A domain name, like {@code google.com}
   *   <li>A IPv4 address string, like {@code 127.0.0.1}

     * even entire message) that simultaneously:
     *
     * - _shouldn't_ be null, so we don't annotate it with @Nullable
     *
     * - _can_ be null without causing a runtime failure (because we don't want the interesting
     *   details of precondition failure to be hidden by an exception we throw about an unexpectedly
     *   null _failure message_)
     *

  }

  /**
   * Returns whether the source has zero bytes. The default implementation first checks {@link
   * #sizeIfKnown}, returning true if it's known to be zero and false if it's known to be non-zero.
   * If the size is not known, it falls back to opening a stream and checking for EOF.
   *
   * <p>Note that, in cases where {@code sizeIfKnown} returns zero, it is <i>possible</i> that bytes

        throw error;
      }
    }
    return urls.build();
  }

  /**
   * These tests fail in JDK 9 and JDK 10 for an unknown reason. It might be the test; it might be
   * the underlying functionality. Fixing this is not a high priority; if you need it to be fixed,
   * please comment on <a href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/3086">issue 3086</a>.
   */
  private static boolean isJdk9OrHigher() {

 *       under all environments. We could fight this by fully qualifying the annotation, but the
 *       result will be verbose and attention-grabbing.
 *   <li>We need to be careful about how we suppress {@code suite()} methods in {@code common.io}.
 *       The generated suite for {@code FooTest} ends up containing {@code FooTest} itself plus some

 *
 * <ol>
 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>hasNext()
 *   <li>hasNext();
 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>next();
 * </ol>
 *
 * <p>This particular order of operations may be unrealistic, and testing all 3^5 of them may be
 * thought of as overkill; however, it's difficult to determine which proper subset of this massive