tester.testConstructors(PatternFilenameFilter.class, Visibility.PACKAGE);
    tester.testStaticMethods(PatternFilenameFilter.class, Visibility.PACKAGE); // currently none

    // The reason that we skip this method is discussed in a comment on the method.
    tester.ignore(PatternFilenameFilter.class.getMethod("accept", File.class, String.class));

   * not fail a test when an exception is thrown from one of its {@link TearDown} instances, but
   * this is subject to change. Also, {@code junit4.TearDownTestCase} will.
   *
   * @throws Exception for any reason. {@code TearDownTestCase} ensures that any exception thrown
   *     will not interfere with other TearDown operations.
   */
  void tearDown() throws Exception;

    for (StandardSystemProperty property : StandardSystemProperty.values()) {
      // Even though the contract in System.getProperties() specifies that a value will exist for
      // all of the listed keys, for some reason the "java.compiler" key returns null in some JVMs.
      if (property == JAVA_COMPILER) {
        continue;
      }
      // Removed in Java 9:

    }
  }

  // If you have a FinalizableReferenceQueue that is a static field of one of the classes of your
  // app (like the FrqUser class above), then the app's ClassLoader will never be gc'd. The reason
  // is that we attempt to run a thread in a separate ClassLoader that will detect when the FRQ
  // is no longer referenced, meaning that the app's ClassLoader has been gc'd, and when that

   * identical inputs: This sounds like it ought to be a problem here, since the goals of this class
   * include testing that {@code equals()} is reflexive and is tolerant of {@code null}. However,
   * there's no problem. The reason: {@link EqualsTester} tests {@code null} and identical inputs
   * directly against {@code equals()} rather than through the {@code Equivalence}.
   */
  private final Equivalence<? super T> equivalence;

 * guarantee that as long as we also require the input type to be non-null[*] (which is a
 * requirement that existing callers already fulfill).
 *
 * Disclaimer: Part of the reason that callers are so well adapted to `Function<A, B>` may be that
 * that is how the signature looked even prior to this comment! So naturally any change can break

 * java.util.LinkedHashSet}. Generally speaking, this class reduces object allocation and memory
 * consumption at the price of moderately increased constant factors of CPU. Only use this class
 * when there is a specific reason to prioritize memory over CPU.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtIncompatible // not worth using in GWT for now
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault

   */
  public static ToStringHelper toStringHelper(String className) {
    return new ToStringHelper(className);
  }

  /**
   * Support class for {@link MoreObjects#toStringHelper}.
   *
   * @author Jason Lee
   * @since 18.0 (since 2.0 as {@code Objects.ToStringHelper}).
   */
  public static final class ToStringHelper {
    private final String className;
    private final ValueHolder holderHead = new ValueHolder();

 * {@link Collections#singleton(Object)} and <a
 * href="https://docs.oracle.com/javase/9/docs/api/java/util/Set.html#immutable">{@code Set.of}</a>,
 * we recommend using <i>these</i> classes instead for this reason (as well as for consistency).
 *
 * <h4>Creation</h4>
 *
 * <p>Except for logically "abstract" types like {@code ImmutableCollection} itself, each {@code

 * {@link Collections#singleton(Object)} and <a
 * href="https://docs.oracle.com/javase/9/docs/api/java/util/Set.html#immutable">{@code Set.of}</a>,
 * we recommend using <i>these</i> classes instead for this reason (as well as for consistency).
 *
 * <h4>Creation</h4>
 *
 * <p>Except for logically "abstract" types like {@code ImmutableCollection} itself, each {@code