policy: enabled
alwaysInjectSelector:
  []
neverInjectSelector:
  []
injectedAnnotations:
template: "{{ Template_Version_And_Istio_Version_Mismatched_Check_Installation }}"
templates:
  sidecar: |
    {{- define "resources"  }}

policy: enabled
alwaysInjectSelector:
  []
neverInjectSelector:
  []
injectedAnnotations:
template: "{{ Template_Version_And_Istio_Version_Mismatched_Check_Installation }}"
templates:
  sidecar: |
    {{- define "resources"  }}

policy: enabled
alwaysInjectSelector:
  []
neverInjectSelector:
  []
injectedAnnotations:
template: "{{ Template_Version_And_Istio_Version_Mismatched_Check_Installation }}"
templates:
  sidecar: |
    {{- define "resources"  }}

policy: enabled
alwaysInjectSelector:
  []
neverInjectSelector:
  []
injectedAnnotations:
template: "{{ Template_Version_And_Istio_Version_Mismatched_Check_Installation }}"
templates:
  sidecar: |
    {{- define "resources"  }}

policy: enabled
alwaysInjectSelector:
  []
neverInjectSelector:
  []
injectedAnnotations:
template: "{{ Template_Version_And_Istio_Version_Mismatched_Check_Installation }}"
templates:
  sidecar: |
    {{- define "resources"  }}

// time zone abbreviation, while strictly speaking those RFCs require the
// use of "GMT" in that case.
// When using the [RFC1123] or [RFC1123Z] formats for parsing, note that these
// formats define a leading zero for the day-in-month portion, which is not
// strictly allowed by RFC 1123. This will result in an error when parsing
// date strings that occur in the first 9 days of a given month.

      // catch absolutely everything and fall through to our 'SafeAtomicHelper'
      // The access control checks that ARFU does means the caller class has to be AbstractFuture
      // instead of SafeAtomicHelper, so we annoyingly define these here
      try {
        helper =
            new SafeAtomicHelper(
                newUpdater(Waiter.class, Thread.class, "thread"),
                newUpdater(Waiter.class, Waiter.class, "next"),

      // catch absolutely everything and fall through to our 'SafeAtomicHelper'
      // The access control checks that ARFU does means the caller class has to be AbstractFuture
      // instead of SafeAtomicHelper, so we annoyingly define these here
      try {
        helper =
            new SafeAtomicHelper(
                newUpdater(Waiter.class, Thread.class, "thread"),
                newUpdater(Waiter.class, Waiter.class, "next"),

  // There are currently two types of anti-affinity:
  //    "requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution"
  //    "preferredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution"
  // which denote “hard” vs. “soft” requirements, you can define your values
  // in "podAntiAffinityLabelSelector" and "podAntiAffinityTermLabelSelector"
  // correspondingly.
  // See https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/configuration/assign-pod-node/#affinity-and-anti-affinity
  //

	// this list must have at least one matching (by name) volumeMount in one
	// container in the template. A claim in this list takes precedence over
	// any volumes in the template, with the same name.
	// TODO: Define the behavior if a claim already exists with the same name.
	// +optional
	// +listType=atomic