configuration.execute(getComponents());
    }

    /**
     * This is an implementation of the {@link groovy.lang.GroovyObject}'s corresponding method.
     * The interface itself is mixed-in at runtime, but we want to keep this implementation as it
     * properly handles the dynamicLookupRoutine.
     *
     * @see AsmBackedClassGenerator.ClassBuilderImpl#addDynamicMethods
     */

			wantStatus: framework.NewStatus(framework.Unschedulable, "preemption: 0/2 nodes are available: 2 Insufficient cpu."),
		},
		{
			name: "no candidate nodes found with mixed reasons, no lower priority pod and no enough CPU resource",
			pod:  st.MakePod().Name("p").UID("p").Namespace(v1.NamespaceDefault).Priority(highPriority).Req(largeRes).Obj(),
			pods: []*v1.Pod{

			name: "ipv6 only",
			proxy: &model.Proxy{
				IPAddresses: []string{"1111:2222::1", "::1", "2222:3333::1"},
			},
			expected: [2]string{WildcardIPv6Address, LocalhostIPv6Address},
		},
		{
			name: "mixed ipv4 and ipv6",
			proxy: &model.Proxy{
				IPAddresses: []string{"1111:2222::1", "::1", "127.0.0.1", "2.2.2.2", "2222:3333::1"},
			},
			expected: [2]string{WildcardAddress, LocalhostAddress},
		},
	}

		expectedErr string
	}{
		{
			name:        "config with kmsv2 and kmsv1, KMSv2=true, KMSv1=false, should fail when feature is disabled",
			filePath:    "testdata/valid-configs/kms/multiple-providers-mixed.yaml",
			expectedErr: "KMSv1 is deprecated and will only receive security updates going forward. Use KMSv2 instead",
		},
		{
			name:        "config with kmsv2, KMSv2=true, KMSv1=false",

	Value: make(map[string][]string),
	File:  make(map[string][]*multipart.FileHeader),
}

// MultipartReader returns a MIME multipart reader if this is a
// multipart/form-data or a multipart/mixed POST request, else returns nil and an error.
// Use this function instead of [Request.ParseMultipartForm] to
// process the request body as a stream.
func (r *Request) MultipartReader() (*multipart.Reader, error) {

												"message": "strings must have odd length",
											},
										},
									},
								},
							},
						},
					}},
				applyPatchOperation{
					"have mixed ratcheting of one or two CEL rules, object4 is ratcheted by one rule, object1 is ratcheting 2 rules",
					myCRDV1Beta1, myCRDInstanceName, map[string]interface{}{
						"field": map[string]interface{}{

				} else {
					msg = "missing type parameter name"
					// go.dev/issue/60812
					if len(list) == 1 {
						msg += " or invalid array length"
					}
				}
			} else {
				msg = "mixed named and unnamed parameters"
			}
			p.syntaxErrorAt(errPos, msg)
		}
	}

	return
}

func (p *parser) badExpr() *BadExpr {
	b := new(BadExpr)
	b.pos = p.pos()
	return b

// * Nothing. This is managed, with IP auto assigned
//
// Not supported:
// Multiple hostname/IP - It is feasible but preference is to create multiple Gateways. This would also break the 1:1 mapping of GW:Service
// Mixed hostname and IP - doesn't make sense; user should define the IP in service
// NamedAddress - Service has no concept of named address. For cloud's that have named addresses they can be configured by annotations,
//

	// If ALL instances have a sidecar, we enable TLS, otherwise we disable
	// TODO(https://github.com/istio/istio/issues/27376) enable mixed deployments
	// A service with passthrough resolution is always passthrough, regardless of the TrafficPolicy.
	if service.Resolution == Passthrough || tp.GetLoadBalancer().GetSimple() == networking.LoadBalancerSettings_PASSTHROUGH {