}()
		bufr := bufio.NewReader(conn)
		line, err := bufr.ReadString('\n')
		if err != nil {
			if writeBody && !test.readBody {
				// This is an acceptable failure due to a possible TCP race:
				// We were still writing data and the server hung up on us. A TCP
				// implementation may send a RST if our request body data was known
				// to be lost, which may trigger our reads to fail.
				// See RFC 1122 page 88.

	// selector should match the labels in the template, which is immutable
	// on its own; therfore, the only way to test selector immutability is
	// when the new selector is changed but still matches the existing labels.
	newSelector := getValidGeneratedSelector()
	newSelector.MatchLabels["foo"] = "bar"
	validTolerations := []api.Toleration{{
		Key:      "foo",
		Operator: api.TolerationOpEqual,

	"pie":                                  "\U0001f967",
	"pig":                                  "\U0001f437",
	"pig2":                                 "\U0001f416",
	"pig_nose":                             "\U0001f43d",
	"pill":                                 "\U0001f48a",
	"pilot":                                "\U0001f9d1\u200d\u2708\ufe0f",
	"pinata":                               "\U0001fa85",

    assertContent("a", getResponse(newRequest("/")))

    // Give the server time to disconnect.
    Thread.sleep(500)

    // This connection will need to be recovered. When it is, transparent gzip should still work!
    assertContent("b", getResponse(newRequest("/")))
    assertThat(server.takeRequest().sequenceNumber).isEqualTo(0)
    // Connection is not pooled.
    assertThat(server.takeRequest().sequenceNumber).isEqualTo(0)

				// a.Offset is still relative to pseudo-SP.
				a.Reg = obj.REG_NONE
			}
			c.instoffset = int64(c.autosize) + a.Offset
			if c.instoffset >= -BIG && c.instoffset < BIG {
				return C_SAUTO
			}
			return C_LAUTO

		case obj.NAME_PARAM:
			if a.Reg == REGSP {
				// unset base register for better printing, since
				// a.Offset is still relative to pseudo-FP.
				a.Reg = obj.REG_NONE

       *
       * Accordingly, we have it annotated as returning `Enumeration<? extends Object>` in our
       * prototype checker's JDK. However, the checker still sees the return type as plain
       * `Enumeration<?>`, probably because of one of the following two bugs (and maybe those two
       * bugs are themselves just symptoms of the same underlying problem):
       *

             * exception in seenExceptions. When we complete secondFuture with the same exception,
             * we want for AggregateFuture to still detect that it's been previously seen.
             */
            secondFuture.setException(sameInstance);
          }
        },
        directExecutor());
    firstFuture.setException(sameInstance);

             * exception in seenExceptions. When we complete secondFuture with the same exception,
             * we want for AggregateFuture to still detect that it's been previously seen.
             */
            secondFuture.setException(sameInstance);
          }
        },
        directExecutor());
    firstFuture.setException(sameInstance);

				dsc.Set(newReplicateTargetDecision(tgtArn, replicate, sync))
				continue
			}
			// can be the case that other cluster is down and duplicate `mc rm --vid`
			// is issued - this still needs to be replicated back to the other target
			if !oi.VersionPurgeStatus.Empty() {
				replicate = oi.VersionPurgeStatus == Pending || oi.VersionPurgeStatus == Failed

		// arg0 is the value being shifted
		// arg1 is the amount to shift, interpreted mod (Q=64,L=32,W=32,B=32)
		// (Note: x86 is weird, the 16 and 8 byte shifts still use all 5 bits of shift amount!)
		// For *const versions, use auxint instead of arg1 as the shift amount. auxint must be in the range 0 to (Q=63,L=31,W=15,B=7) inclusive.