// expected-error @+1 {{tfl.reshape' op requires 'shape' to have at most one dynamic dimension, but got multiple dynamic dimensions at indices 0 and 1. You need to set up the unspecified size(s) to avoid this problem, for example,setting batch size in keras model or setting unspecified input size(s) with fixed ones.}}
  %0 = "tfl.reshape"(%arg0, %cst) : (tensor<3x4xi32>, tensor<3xi32>) -> tensor<1x3x4xi32>
  func.return %0 : tensor<1x3x4xi32>

		// net stack), this can result in an infinite retry loop that doesn't
		// propagate the error up far enough for us to adjust the WriteTimeout.
		//
		// To avoid that problem, we explicitly forbid internal retries by rejecting
		// them in a Proxy hook in the transport.
		var retries atomic.Int32
		cst.c.Transport.(*Transport).Proxy = func(*Request) (*url.URL, error) {
			if retries.Add(1) != 1 {

// were for the full stack frame. However, in the case where the called function was
// one of these wrappers, the rewritten receiver is almost certainly a different type
// than the original receiver. This is not a problem on the stack, where we use the
// program counter to determine the type information and understand that
// during (*Outer).M the receiver is an *Outer while during (*Inner).M the receiver in the same

	"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/pluginmanager"
	kubepod "k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/pod"
	podtest "k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/pod/testing"
	proberesults "k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/prober/results"
	probetest "k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/prober/testing"
	"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/secret"
	"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/server"
	serverstats "k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/server/stats"
	"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/stats"

      Class<X> exceptionType, ClosingFunction<? super X, ? extends V> fallback, Executor executor) {
    return catchingMoreGeneric(exceptionType, fallback, executor);
  }

  // Avoids generic type capture inconsistency problems where |? extends V| is incompatible with V.
  private <X extends Throwable, W extends V> ClosingFuture<V> catchingMoreGeneric(
      Class<X> exceptionType, final ClosingFunction<? super X, W> fallback, Executor executor) {

      Class<X> exceptionType, ClosingFunction<? super X, ? extends V> fallback, Executor executor) {
    return catchingMoreGeneric(exceptionType, fallback, executor);
  }

  // Avoids generic type capture inconsistency problems where |? extends V| is incompatible with V.
  private <X extends Throwable, W extends V> ClosingFuture<V> catchingMoreGeneric(
      Class<X> exceptionType, final ClosingFunction<? super X, W> fallback, Executor executor) {

ax_t":1229478785,"mean_t":1229213790},{"name":"text-dom-01-f-expected.checksum","kids":[],"cl_weight":0.0014346856765385886,"touches":2,"min_t":1228948796,"max_t":1229478785,"mean_t":1229213790},{"name":"scrolling-embedded-svg-file-image-repaint-problem-expected.png","kids":[],"cl_weight":0.0014346856765385886,"touches":2,"min_t":1228948796,"max_t":1229478785,"mean_t":1229213790},{"name":"control-points-for-S-and-T-expected.png","kids":[],"cl_weight":0.0014346856765385886,"touches":2,"min_t":122...

    testSecureStreamingPost(TransferKind.FIXED_LENGTH)
  }

  @Test
  fun secureChunkedStreaming() {
    testSecureStreamingPost(TransferKind.CHUNKED)
  }

  /**
   * Users have reported problems using HTTPS with streaming request bodies.
   * http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=12860
   */
  private fun testSecureStreamingPost(streamingMode: TransferKind) {

    successfulAsList(ImmutableList.of(SettableFuture.create())).cancel(true);

    /*
     * Complex (combined.cancel -> input.cancel -> other.set -> setOneValue),
     * to show that this isn't just about problems with the input future we just
     * cancelled:
     */
    final SettableFuture<String> future1 = SettableFuture.create();
    final SettableFuture<String> future2 = SettableFuture.create();

    successfulAsList(ImmutableList.of(SettableFuture.create())).cancel(true);

    /*
     * Complex (combined.cancel -> input.cancel -> other.set -> setOneValue),
     * to show that this isn't just about problems with the input future we just
     * cancelled:
     */
    final SettableFuture<String> future1 = SettableFuture.create();
    final SettableFuture<String> future2 = SettableFuture.create();