return new TreeMap<>();
  }

  /**
   * Creates a <i>mutable</i> {@code TreeMap} instance with the same mappings as the specified map
   * and using the same ordering as the specified map.
   *
   * <p><b>Note:</b> if mutability is not required, use {@link
   * ImmutableSortedMap#copyOfSorted(SortedMap)} instead.
   *

 *
 * <h3>Cancelling</h3>
 *
 * Any step in a pipeline can be {@linkplain #cancel(boolean) cancelled}, even after another step
 * has been derived, with the same semantics as cancelling a {@link Future}. In addition, a
 * successfully cancelled step will immediately start closing all objects captured for later closing
 * by it and by its input steps.
 *
 * <h3>Ending a pipeline</h3>

            "type": "string"
          },

            "type": "string"
          },

public void Os(String); public void setFamily(String); public void setName(String); public void setArch(String); public void setVersion(String); public boolean eval() throws Exception; public static boolean isFamily(String); public static boolean isName(String); public static boolean isArch(String); public static boolean isVersion(String); public static boolean isOs(String, String, String, String); static void <clinit>(); } org/codehaus/plexus/util/PathTool.class package org.codehaus.plexus.util;...

	// matches, as due to root store semantics it is plausible that (at least on the system
	// verifiers) multiple identical (looking) chains may be returned when two roots with the
	// same subject are present.
	for _, expectedChain := range test.expectedChains {
		var match bool
		for _, chain := range chains {
			if doesMatch(expectedChain, chain) {
				match = true
				break
			}
		}

            "type": "string"

            "type": "string"

          // TODO(b/287306548): we need more rigorous check to make sure the
          // node we're updating is the right one for now we're just ensuring
          // they have the same number of input, output and first output is
          // the same
          if (key_inputs.size() == inputs.size() &&
              key_outputs.size() == outputs.size() &&
              key_outputs[0] == outputs[0]) {
            ret &=

			}
		})
	}
}

// The point of this test is to show that you:
//   - get the same priority for a zero-request pod as for a pod with the defaults requests,
//     both when the zero-request pod is already on the node and when the zero-request pod
//     is the one being scheduled.
//   - don't get the same score no matter what we schedule.
func TestZeroRequest(t *testing.T) {