// matches, as due to root store semantics it is plausible that (at least on the system
	// verifiers) multiple identical (looking) chains may be returned when two roots with the
	// same subject are present.
	for _, expectedChain := range test.expectedChains {
		var match bool
		for _, chain := range chains {
			if doesMatch(expectedChain, chain) {
				match = true
				break
			}
		}

			// On Windows, time.Now() is not as precise, 2 consecutive calls may return the same timestamp.
			// Thus, all the QueuedPodInfos can have the same timestamps, which can be an issue
			// when we're expecting them to be popped in a certain order (the Less function
			// sorts them by Timestamps if they have the same Pod Priority).
			// Using a fake clock for the queue and incrementing it after each added Pod will

            "type": "string"

            "type": "string"

			}
			// Setup tests for various forms of the API
			// TODO: it may be necessary to vary the inputs of the hash and ensure we get a different backend
			// But its pretty hard to test that, so for now just ensure we hit the same one.
			t.RunTraffic(TrafficTestCase{
				name:   "source ip " + c.Config().Service,
				config: svc + tmpl.MustEvaluate(destRule, "useSourceIp: true"),
				call:   c.CallOrFail,
				opts:   callOpts,
			})

            "type": "string"
          },

				ValsEqualThemselvesAndDataLiteral("self.val5", "self.val6", fmt.Sprintf("%d", math.MaxInt64)),
				"self.val1 == self.val6", // integer with no format is the same as int64
				"type(self.val1) == int",
				fmt.Sprintf("self.val3 + 1 == %d + 1", math.MaxInt32), // CEL integers are 64 bit
				"type(self.val3) == int",
				"type(self.val5) == int",
			},
			errors: map[string]string{

          // TODO(b/287306548): we need more rigorous check to make sure the
          // node we're updating is the right one for now we're just ensuring
          // they have the same number of input, output and first output is
          // the same
          if (key_inputs.size() == inputs.size() &&
              key_outputs.size() == outputs.size() &&
              key_outputs[0] == outputs[0]) {
            ret &=

			}
		})
	}
}

// The point of this test is to show that you:
//   - get the same priority for a zero-request pod as for a pod with the defaults requests,
//     both when the zero-request pod is already on the node and when the zero-request pod
//     is the one being scheduled.
//   - don't get the same score no matter what we schedule.
func TestZeroRequest(t *testing.T) {

	if a1 == a2 {
		t.Logf("made two requests from a single conn %q (as expected)", a1)
	} else {
		t.Errorf("server reported requests from %q and %q; expected same connection", a1, a2)
	}

	// The two requests should have used the same connection,
	// and there should not have been a second connection that
	// was created by racing dial against reuse.
	// (The first get was completed when the second get started.)